Home

The One Question I’m Not Asking Moiself

Comments Off on The One Question I’m Not Asking Moiself

 

Department Of I Don’t Know What Kind Of A Thing This Is,
But It Is A Thing, For Me

Dateline: Tuesday morning: 7:50 AM: morning walk. I pass under an electric or phone line where two crows are perching, and it makes me happy to see them. For some reason whenever this happens – this being, passing under or near a structure or object where there are a couple of crows hanging out – I feel safe (I do not worry about an onslaught of feces falling from the sky, as I would if there were geese or gulls overhead). Knowing the intelligence of crows and other corvids, I just assume that, somehow, they discern that not only is this biped *not* a threat to them, she’s also A Good Person®, and thus they will either warn me of/protect me from danger.

 

Yeah; she’s cool.

 

*   *   *

Department Of I Can’t Say It Any Better…

And I don’t need to, because a cherished friend of mine did.  LS is a veteran of the US’s armed services, and has lived In Europe for many years.  A keen cultural observer, he has both an insider’s and outsider’s perspective of life in these United States.  His heartfelt (and heartbreaking) eloquence about the current situation (read:  #47’s tyranny)…perhaps this should be this post’s coda, and not its opening?

“Some news outlets here are simultaneously laughing at and very woeful of the president and his supporters. How he creates chaos to cover for a lack of meaningful achievement. That he OPENLY & shamelessly campaigns for the Peace prize while opening up a concentration camp, invading his own country, shooting peaceful protesters with pepper bullets…etc.

It’s another awful chapter in the history of the states.   I hope that this mess of an administration is soon relieved of its hold on the throats of the populace, that I get my Social security check with interest, and that you and yours remain safe. K   [1] is a determined young man to have to pass this shit every day and not let it get to him

Oh, one other thing that is being said over here, is that the U.S. is not yet angry enough to kick him out. That if the people of the U.S. would protest like the French, he would not be as powerful as he is now. Meaning that, the French, when they want change, protest around the clock. No respite. Yes, they do get violent, destructive and sometimes deadly, but then they do get results. It is pointed out that 47 would never visit France. He’s not liked there and instead of being called “Daddy”…he would be met with roadblocks of burning tires to impede his travel here, rocks slung at his cars, (they still use the sling, think David and Goliath) and would use drones to shine lasers into his drivers’ eyes. The Secret Service wouldn’t know how to handle all this at once. Feel free to write about or implement any or all of the French tactics.

In truth, with all kidding aside, even though I’m here, I still hurt for you all over there. I’m watching as the country I once stood for is rapidly falling apart. It just makes me cringe that, the military I once was proud of, now bends to the epitome of fascist idealism. It spreads throughout the ranks and empowers the worst of the nazis in American military uniform. The vow of defense against this exact type of administration seems to mean nothing to those who are walking the streets of American cities hoping that they can open up on their fellow citizens. I hurt, and deeply.”

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Find Something Nice To Say…Or, Not

Dateline:  Monday ~8 am, interesting breakfast conversation over a not-so-interesting movie  (read: I cringed to watch it).  This movie starred Meg Ryan and David Duchovny, playing supposedly “older” people….well, at least Duchovny has allowed himself to age (if he’s had work done it doesn’t show as much as Ryan’s, whose face and mouth seem permanently frozen in whatever dastardly quicksand she allowed herself to be pulled into).

Moiself  started watching said movie, What Happens Later, during my morning elliptical workout Friday, when I often go to Netflix and just see what might be tolerable for 35 minutes in the morning.  I attempted to finish it during Monday morning’s session, hoping that it would somehow…change?    [2]  There’s only a couple of minutes left, but I’m not sure if I wanna know if the ending is as insipidly cliched as the rest of the movie would seem to indicate and that the “the-universe-is-trying-to-tell-us-something-via-the magickal-airport-announcerstupid cutesy/quirky trajectory is leading up to.

 

Well, that’s a bit harsh, Roger…

 

What Happens Later.  As in, besides my retching?  Really; how did that movie get made?  And why wasn’t moiself  asked to unmake it, or at least edit the holy clichéd, cloying crap out of it?    [3]

Moiself (making my Sour Face)  to MH:
“Oh my, that movie is…sadly, embarrassingly bad.”

Moiself (deciding to lighten up and Find The Bright Side®):
 “I guess, for an actor, it was impressive in that it’s essentially a two person play, so they each had to learn a lot of dialogue…”

(Yeah, I should have stopped there.)

…”Too bad most of it sucked.”

MH (ever quick to grab his phone and look it up):
“It says that the movie was directed by Ryan.”

Moiself (gasping):
“Oh no…really?  Duchovny indicates unhappiness and stodginess by acting like a piece of wood; Meg Ryan is her most Meg Ryan-ness – not acting, just *being*.  Just playing the same, quintessential Meg Ryan character, adorably ditsy but with a quirky/plucky heart…. At least in her past movies she could blame the director for not requiring more of her.”

MH:
“I’m always wondered, how does that work? When an actor is the movie’s director and also acts in the movie. Director Meg: “Okay, Meg, that was good.  Can you give me something more?”  Actor Meg: ‘More, as in…?  Could you be specific?’ “

Moiself:
“So: I’m wondering, is the self-lawyer warning analogous to movie-making?  As in, ‘He who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client.’  ‘She who directs herself ‘e whoanalogous has a fool for a leading lady?’

 

 

Yet another nit to pick is the dialogue (I realize the actors didn’t write it), particularly one profundity-attempting clunker Ryan’s character spouts near the end of the movie:

“Isn’t that the one question we should be asking ourselves –
“Are we happy?’ “

Feckin’ no, that is *not* the one question we should be asking ourselves.   [4].  And for so many feckin’ reasons.

Reason 1:  there’s not one question we should be asking ourselves; there are 23.  [5]

Reason 2: Because if I ask moiself  the question Am I happy?  when I’m doing the exact wrong thing for me or for others, it might not be clear, either in the moment or looking back, whether or not I’m happy.  I could indeed be happy doing that which is wrong; the answer could be a false positive.  Or, because what I’m doing might be the right thing to do – say, standing up for someone else who is being bullied  (which can have short or even long term unhappy consequences for me, due to the fact that other people’s – the bully’s – responses and reactions will not make me happy) – doing the right thing very often is difficult and does not make you happy.  IMO, if you base your actions on the certitude of your own happiness you’re guaranteed a first class seat on the nonstop flight to selfish-and-shallow-but happy!-ness.

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Yet Another Contributory, Nit-Picking Reason For
Why We ( “The Good Guys®” ) Lost The Election
#12 (at least) In A Series

Moiself  looked forward to this podcast episode, especially as per its intro:

“Whether you call it citizen science, participatory science, or community science, research conducted by everyday people has led to major discoveries across a wide range of fields. This episode, host Dr. Samantha Yammine is joined by Dr. Caren Cooper to discuss the benefits and mechanics when it comes to public participation in science. Dr. Cooper is an expert in the field and the author of Citizen Science: How Ordinary People are Changing the Face of Discovery…”
( intro to Curiosity Weekly podcast, How Everyday People Power Big Science )

And then, the host asks her guest where she “stands” on language?  I truly did not anticipate this (although it shouldn’t have surprised me).

CW host Yammine:
“…Looking forward to chatting with you. And the very first question I wanna ask you, because it’s the title of your book, Citizen Science, but there are some debates about whether that’s the right word to use.
Can you tell us a little bit about the thoughts people have around that language, and where you Stand on it?”

Dr. Cooper:
Sure. Yeah, yeah. Okay. Go right to the Can of Worms course on that. Right. Well it’s interesting.
Yeah. So most of the concern around the term Citizen Science arose in the US….

 

 

 

“… kind of around whether it might be excluding people because it conveys like this notion that you have to have some kind of citizenship status. Yeah. You know, where it’s really trying to – the intention I think of the term was to more convey that it’s like a civic opportunity to like contribute to something of importance.

It’s supposed to be Citizen Science. Yes. In the context of citizen of the world person who feels responsibility and obligations to take part in things that help improve society and everything about our planet. So yeah, it’s more to convey like a responsibility more rather than like something that might restrict people. Because really participatory projects, no matter what they end up being called, are open to all that is the main goal. And they’re also meant to benefit all the term, really brought together a very interdisciplinary group of people. Like there were scientists in so many different fields that were using what came to be called Citizen Science but didn’t even connect or know each other….”

Poor Dr. Cooper goes on in defensive mode much longer than she should have to.  Guess she didn’t get the memo that, in this country, how you phrase something is more important than the something itself, lest fraught and fragile sensibilities feel offended or excluded or invalidated or….

 

Because actually saying something precise – we just won’t stand for that.

 

*   *   *

Department Of A Blast From The Past

Dateline: January. New Year; new project: taking an excerpt from a past blog, from the same time frame (the second Friday of whatever month).  Perhaps moiself  will like this enough that it will turn out to be a regular blog feature for 2025.  So far it has, but time, and my capacity for reruns, will tell.

This journey down memory lane is related to the most convincing reason a YOU-of-all-people-should-write-a-blog-why-aren’t-you-writing-a-blog?!?!?!  [6]   friend gave me, all those years ago,   [7]   as to why I should be writing a blog: a blog would serve as a journal of sorts for my life.  Journal/diary-resistant moiself  would have some sort of a record, or at least a random sampling, of what was on my mind – and possibly what was on the nation’s mind – during a certain period of time.

Now I can, for example, look back to the second Friday of a years-ago October, to see what I was thinking. (or as MH put it, WHAT was I thinking!?!? )

 

 

Here is an excerpt from my blog of 10-11-2013 ( The Ring I’m Not Wearing ):

I never wore an engagement ring, for a variety of reasons, including this one.  I just didn’t get the point of it – excuse the senior moment.  Yeah, right.  Make that, I damn well got the point of it, and what I got about it made me ill.

Would you wear an engagement ring? I asked MH, a long long time ago in a dating world far, far away, when we were discussing Our Future ®.  If a woman and a man are both engaged to be married, what’s the point – other than that point which is analogous to dog pissing around a certain spot to mark its territory     [8]  – for the woman and not the man to wear such a signifier?

 

MH, knowing me well,  [9]  didn’t bother with The Ring when he proposed marriage. We later chose simple gold wedding bands with a double weave design (and had the date of our wedding engraved on the inside of the band, for those pesky moments when you need a memory prompt.)

 

 

As of this writing, neither MH nor I are wearing our wedding rings. A couple of weeks ago MH said he wanted to tell me, in case I’d noticed and had wondered   [10]    his ring was “missing,” that he’d been experiencing painful arthritis-like symptoms in his finger joints and had removed the ring in order to massage the joint. He feared he would be unable to remove the ring later if his joints continued to swell.

The next day I took off my wedding ring.  Since then, I’ve discovered (after looking and asking) that quite a few married couples do not wear wedding rings, usually for medical or similar reasons.   [11]   My motivation for ring-doffing was similar to my not-wanting-an-engagement-ring reason.  There was no spite or snit fit involved; just pure and practical (to me) relationship logic: I’m not going to wear my ring if MH isn’t wearing his.

I notice my ring’s absence several times a day, when instinctively performing what has become my après-hand washing ritual for the past twenty-five years (twisting the ring and blowing on my ring finger to dry underneath the ring).  I’m aware that it’s not there, but I don’t exactly miss wearing it. I was never a ring-bling person, and other than the two months in high school when I wore the class ring my parents insisted I purchase,  [12]   I’d never worn a ring prior to getting married (not counting the groovy Man From U.N.C.L.E. spy ring I got in a box of Cracker Jacks).

 

 

If you want us to wear wedding rings, I said to MH, perhaps we could have new ones designed, with some kind of custom feature (a latch of sorts, that would not pinch the skin) to make removal easy and allow for future, uh, joint expansion.  Belle seems rather pleased with the solution she proposed for our ring dilemma: finally, a legitimate excuse reason to urge her parents to get “tatted.”    [13]

 

 

*   *   *

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [14]

The Question We *Should* Be Asking Ourselves:
Is It True, Or Merely Familiar?

 

Wait – I think I’ve seen this before… It must be true.

*   *   *

May you appreciate our corvid protectors;
May you be able to distinguish truth from familiarity;
May whatever happens later in your life not lead to retching;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

 

[1] My son, referred to as “K” in this blog, lives near the ICE center in Portland.

[2] Like, its tone, plot, dialog…just get “better”?

[3] Maybe – just perhaps – not being in the movie business has something to do with it.

[4] Or anyone else.

[5] Because 23 is a prime number, that’s why.

[6] I was adamant about not writing a blog…thus, the title of the blog I eventually decided to write.

[7] Was it really over twelve years ago?

[8] I’m a hardcore romantic, what can I say?

[9] And yet still wanting to marry me, imagine that.

[10] I hadn’t noticed, and therefore hadn’t wondered.

[11] Typically weight gain, or joint swelling during pregnancy or as a side effect of medications, etc.

[12] They didn’t want me to miss having that classic high school insignia…which I lost while bodysurfing at Newport Beach.

[13] Nice try, Belle.  We never did the tats; both MH & moiself  both wear stretchy, silicon rings (which come in a variety of colors and only cost ~ $20 each so you don’t feel bad when you lose them).

[14] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Content/Trigger Warnings I Am No Longer Posting

Comments Off on The Content/Trigger Warnings I Am No Longer Posting

… At least not seriously.

 

Trigger Warning

 

Surprise (well, not really)!  Turns out, content/trigger warnings are, themselves, triggering.

Just a wee sample of what be going down re this subject:

What if Trigger Warnings Don’t Work?
New psychological research suggests that trigger warnings do not reduce negative reactions to disturbing material,
and may even increase them.
( The New Yorker   )

 

 

I’d been wondering about that – as in, wondering when someone would get around to studying the downsides of that which is often prefaced (or later appended) with They meant well, and  It was done with good intentions.

“…the value of trigger warnings has been hotly debated. Proponents argue that they serve to inform and educate consumers of the content they are about to consume. They argue that people, particularly those who have suffered a traumatic experience in their past, will be better able to handle difficult content if they are prepared in advance and are given the choice to engage or not.

Opponents argue that trigger warnings coddle and infantilize adults, and that they facilitate avoidance and/or inflate morbid and prurient curiosities, thus increasing rather than decreasing emotional turmoil and anxiety. In promoting avoidance of challenging material, opponents argue, trigger warnings also run counter to the clinical literature, which shows that trauma is best overcome through exposure rather than avoidance…..

… a meta-analysis of the literature on trigger warnings…indicated that warnings were ineffective at their proposed goals….  The results show, in effect, that…. Trigger warnings are neither necessary nor devastating for those who receive them. ‘Existing research on content warnings, content notes, and trigger warnings…suggests that they are fruitless, although they do reliably induce a period of uncomfortable anticipation.’

(excerpts, my emphases, “Trigger Warnings Can Be Triggering:
Recent research questions the utility of trigger warnings.
Trauma: Psychology Today, 4-1-24 )

 

 

Let’s say you are a

* writer; college professor; a stand-up comic; journalist

And you are

* writing an article/giving a lecture on/composing a skit

which mentions assault, and you voluntarily (or are forced to, by an editor; nightclub manager; faculty dean, or some other gatekeeper) post a content warning, ala

( The following article/lecture/performance subject matter
deals with assault
,
or whatever the ostensible trigger).

What you have done is to guarantee that the intended audience for that content warning – someone who has been assaulted – is now thinking about the fact that they were assaulted, without having the benefit of reading or hearing your material.  Indeed, there may be benefits to them reading or hearing your material, but they’ll never know, because they’ve been warned away from it, AND, because of that warning, they are now thinking about their assault – they’ve been “triggered” – without obtaining different perspective or knowledge about or possible relief from their experience.

Dateline: too many decades ago. I read a book about Saturday Night Live

 

…maybe this one?

 

…the long running, live sketch comedy-variety show which was then in its infancy.  The book included a couple of scripts for SNL skits that never made it on the air, usually (not always)  [1],  because the director and/or the network censor thought the skit’s humor went “too far.” One memorable ( to moiself ) censored skit was about family and friends in a hospital room, visiting a girl who had been in a coma for some time.  A couple of the visitors brought bouquets of flowers; one visitor, not quite sure what to do, announced to the girl’s parents that he had brought “some moss for her north side.”

I later read a review of that book, which featured an interview with a woman whose daughter was hospitalized in a PVS (persistent vegetative state).  This woman had also read the SNL book, and when she read the script of that girl-in-a-coma skit, she said that she laughed “…for the first time in months.”  Reading about that canceled skit-that-went-too-far/included-jokes-of-questionable-taste was helpful to her, providing some well-needed levity in a life that had turned bleak.  If that book had had a trigger alert, she might have been steered away (“Oops, I better not read this – it might upset me”) from what turned out to be a totally unexpected yet therapeutic form of relief for her.

Arguably some of the more problematic places for content warnings are schools – particularly in university classrooms, where many professors have voiced their own content warnings about what they have become “allowed” to say and teach.

“….The American Association of University Professors (AAUP) has also tackled the issue, and it has come down squarely against TW (trigger warnings).

Here are some of the most salient points of the AAUP report:

* The presumption that students need to be protected rather than challenged in a classroom is at once infantilizing and anti-intellectual.

* [TW] single out politically controversial topics like sex, race, class, capitalism, and colonialism for attention. … If such topics are associated with triggers, correctly or not, they are likely to be marginalized if not avoided altogether….

* Trigger warnings conflate exceptional individual experience of trauma with the anticipation of trauma for an entire group.

* A trigger warning might lead a student to simply not read an assignment or it might elicit a response from students they otherwise would not have had.

* Some discomfort is inevitable in classrooms if the goal is to expose students to new ideas, have them question beliefs they have taken for granted, grapple with ethical problems they have never considered.

* Trigger warnings reduce students to vulnerable victims rather than full participants in the intellectual process of education.

* The classroom is not the appropriate venue to treat PTSD, which is a medical condition that requires serious medical treatment….”

( Excerpts, “The False Dichotomy of Trigger Warnings
by Massimo Pigliucci, ITAL The Philosophers’ Magazine  )

 

 

“In 2019, the (Tate) museum warned patrons of the ‘violent’ and ‘challenging’ images at the entrance to an exhibition of 200-year-old works by painter William Blake, known for his then-radical approach to exploring struggles throughout 18th Century England.

In 2020, Tate slapped a ‘sexually explicit content’ warning on an exhibition of illustrations by Victorian-era artist Aubrey Beardsley, best known for his… well, sexually explicit content. It’s the trigger warning equivalent of a ‘contains cream’ label on a gallon of ice cream…..

It is very possible that these attempts to place buffers around art, education and even children’s entertainment are not only useless but counterproductive. A 2020 study published in the journal ITAL Clinical Psychological Science found that trigger warnings offer little to no help in avoiding painful memories and, on the contrary, may actually be harmful for those with associated emotional trauma.

‘Specifically, we found that trigger warnings did not help trauma survivors brace themselves to face potentially upsetting content,’ said Payton Jones, the study’s lead author and a researcher at Harvard. ‘In some cases, they made things worse.’

Trigger warnings also perpetuate a culture of victimhood. Researchers discovered that they seem to increase the extent to which people see trauma as central to their identity – which, in addition to making them insufferable in general, can also worsen the impact of their PTSD.

‘I was surprised that something so small – a few trigger warnings in a short experiment –could influence the way someone views their trauma,’ continued Jones. ‘In our culture, I think we overemphasize how important trauma should be in a person’s life. Trigger warnings are one example of this.’

( excerpts, my emphases, “Top 10 Signs Trigger Warnings Have Gone Too Far”
by
Christopher Dale, Listverse; Politics | March 4, 2021 )

 

 

*   *   *

*   *   *

Department Of Why I Like Walking Just Before Sunrise

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of My, That’s A Big One

Dateline: Saturday.  MH and moiself  made a trip up to Winlock, WA to see the  World’s Largest Egg ®. Actually, the trip was to see daughter Belle, who hadn’t been able to get time off from work to spend Christmas with us.  Doing the Google maps thing, MH determined that the lil town o’ Winlock was at a halfway point between where Belle lives in Washington, and when MH discovered that Winlock was also home to a notable Roadside Attraction ® – the  WLE –   that was all the inspiration we needed.  We met Belle In Winlock for lunch, exchanged belated Christmas gifts and had fun playing the new party game she gave us (“Priorities”) while eating some of the worst pizza/pasta ever,  [2]  then checked out the  WLE before bidding our daughter a fond à plus tard and heading back to our respective domiciles.

 

Ah, so this is how they keep the young folks in Winlock.

 

*   *   *

Department Of A Blast From The Past

New Year; new project: taking an excerpt from a past blog, from the same time frame (the second Friday of whatever month).  Perhaps moiself  will like this enough that it will turn out to be a regular blog feature for 2025?  Time, and my capacity for reruns, will tell.

This journey down memory lane is related to the most convincing reason a  YOU-of-all-people-should-write-a-blog-why-aren’t-you-writing-a-blog?!?!?!   [3]   friend gave me, all those years ago,   [4]   as to why I should be writing a blog: a blog would serve as a journal of sorts for my life.  Journal/diary-resistant moiself  would have some sort of a record, or at least a random sampling, of what was on my mind – and possibly what was on the nation’s mind – during a certain period of time.

Now I can, for example, look back to the second Friday of a years-ago January to see what I was thinking. (or as MH putc it, WHAT was I thinking!?!? )

 

 

Here is an excerpt from my blog of 1-12-18 ( The Bullet List I’m Not Embracing ).

 

 

We’ve discovered that opportunities for the gathering of anesthesia-induced babbling memories do not fade with age,    [5]   and are perhaps even more enjoyable when your children are young adults. Last Friday afternoon, Belle underwent a procedure which required general anesthesia. After MH and I were allowed to see her in the post-op recovery room, I did not record her ramblings (Belle was with it enough to object to that), but did manage to take a few notes. There are some gems I know I missed, mostly because I just wanted to be present to enjoy the stream of conscious moments caused by her brain only partially connecting with her mouth:

*   “Is there boob PT?
(After MH and I told Belle that the upper floors of the building she was in were dominated by Orthopedic surgeons and PTs -Psychical Therapists.)

*   “It stays on for THREE DAYS.
Belle pointed to the anti-nausea patch the anesthesiologist had placed on the side of her neck, then lowered her voice to a solemn whisper.  “That’s a lotta days!”

* Belle said the nurses told her she was talking about bear heads (   “Let me tell you about the grizzly bear head…” ), and that they don’t get many people who talk about bear heads.    [6] 

“Do you remember when people were, like, in the future, everything will be chrome?  It didn’t happen.  I think they meant stainless steel.”

* Belle: “I’d like to be Spider-Man.”

Moiself: “But you don’t like spiders.”

Belle: “No sir, I do not. But, I appreciate spiders.”

* “Seth Meyers is like a marshmallow, with good hair.”   [7] 

While waiting for the nurse to remove her IV, Belle began to describe to MH and I, with great seriousness, how the cycle of banana mitosis and meiosis indicates that bananas can tell time. The morning after her surgery, I asked Belle if she remembered doing that. She said she didn’t, but that it’s no surprise because,  “Actually, I talk about that a lot.”   [8]

 

Why carry a watch when you can just ask the banana on your head what time it is?

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [9]

“Humanism affirms that people can solve their problems without imagining
supernatural beings; the arts and sciences flourish when ignorance and superstition
are thus overthrown.”

( Joe Nickell, American author, editor, investigator of “paranormal” phenomena,
senior research fellow for the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry )

\

*   *   *

May you not be triggered by trigger warnings;
May you enjoy a trip to see a notable roadside attraction;
May you one day be able to tell the time by
consulting the banana on your head;

…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

 

[1] Sometimes it was just a matter of time – the show ran long in rehearsal and something had to be cut.

[2] Which shall not be mentioned here

[3] I was adamant about not writing a blog…thus, the title of the blog I eventually decided to write.

[4] Was it really over twelve years ago?

[5] This is contingent upon having surgery for something relatively minor, ala wisdom teeth removal.

[6] This one makes sense to me, and probably was not the non sequitur the nurses thought it to be: Belle has prepped stuffed and mounted a grizzly bear head in her work as a docent for her college’s natural history museum.

[7] I likely sparked that comment by mentioning that Seth Meyers was hosting the Golden Globe Awards show.

[8] She’s a Biology major.

[9] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Attention I’m Not Paying

Comments Off on The Attention I’m Not Paying

Department of The Importance Of Paying Atten — SQUIRREL !!!!…
What Was I Saying?

“I’m so poor I can’t even pay attention.”
( Moiself’s  favorite excuse when called out by a high school teacher for goofing off
in class and distracting other students. )

 

 

Dateline: Sunday; 7:40 AM-ish;    [1]   listening to the  No Stupid Questions podcast’s latest episode, Is Your Attention Span Shrinking?  Moiself  finds in the subject matter an abundance of questions to contemplate, while I put one foot in front of the other and try not to trip over the wet leaves in the street gutters – and why is it that I am recently noticing that wet leaves look as beautiful, only in a different way, than the leaves still on their respective trees, during the autumnal color change?  Their colors seem just as, if not more, vibrant, and if I posted a picture of them…

Yet again, I digress.  

During and after listening to the podcast I had an abundance of questions spinning through my brain, including but not limited to,

* Does a wealth of information inevitably lead to a dearth of attention?

* What’s the deal with of selective attention  – why did our brains evolve that skill?  Why not pay attention to “everything?” Does it have to do with the fact that cognition so dang expensive, metabolically speaking ( our brain consumes more energy than any other part of our body )?

*  Is it true, as alleged by social and behavioral scientists (and any parent who’s tried to get their teenager to put down their phone and complete a household that takes more than four minutes), that human attention spans have shrunk?

* How do you even measure the attention span of someone in 2024 and try to compare it with, say, the average person’s attention span in 1854?

* Maybe attention spans have stayed the same, only we now have more things and experiences vying for that attention?

 

 

In this episode,  NSQ  cohost Angela Duckworth frequently cites the work of the late great Herb Simon.  Simon was an American scholar interested in the fields of computer science, cognitive psychology, and decision-making.  Simon was ahead of his time when, years before internet surfing and social media were things, and years before teachers, parents, psychologists, and neurologists noted the phenomenon of shrinking attention spans, he posited that

A wealth of information creates a poverty of attention. 

Duckworth, after bemoaning the increasing technology-aided demands on her attention, told of a surprise recommendation she received, to switch to a “dumb” phone (technical name, light phone).  The surprise was that the recommendation came from Duckworth’s daughter – someone in the age group you would least expect to voluntarily set aside a smart phone to use a phone that basically acts as a…gasp…phone.   [2]

 

 

DUCKWORTH:
“… I think I get like 200 emails a day…a hundred of which actually require a substantive reply. I feel like my attention is just being grabbed, like pulled by the collar, you know, one place or the other. And I will say that when Herb Simon says that “a wealth of information creates a poverty of attention” — I feel like there is so much that I could pay attention to, and indeed, I feel impoverished because this limited resource…this little spotlight that I have…I only have one. It’s like, ‘Oh, it can go here or it can go here.’ You know, I do feel kind of robbed. And one of the books that I started reading, but I haven’t gotten too far into it, is called Stolen Focus (by Johann Hari)….”     [3] 

It was recommended to me by my daughter, Lucy, who’s 21. She was like, ‘I totally [agree with] this hypothesis that Johann Hari puts forth,’ which is that we really are in a kind of war of distraction…we’re living the world that Herb Simon described well before he could anticipate just how many distractions there would be. The book really focuses on technology, by the way. So, she tells me with great urgency… ‘Mom, you have to read this book.’ The last time I checked in with Lucy, she had gone even a step farther.

So, there is a thing called a Light Phone.   I actually got one as a gift once….if we have smartphones, it’s like deliberately a ‘dumb phone,’ because…you can’t use maps. You can’t surf the internet. You can’t go to social media. Because I think there are a lot of people who are like, ‘You know what? I need to modify my situation. I can’t use willpower. Like, I cannot just will myself to pay attention to what I need to pay attention to.’….

So, the Light Phone…was literally just a phone. I was like, really? This 21-year-old is delighted to have a phone that has reversed the technological trends of 20-plus years of engineering. And I think it’s…because she feels like she has put herself in a room not with an infinite buffet of things that she could go look at, or listen to, or swipe to, or click to, and just kind of taken more control. She wants less information because she senses in herself this ‘poverty of attention.’  I don’t know how much this is going to be a trend, but I think she’s experiencing something that honestly, we’re all experiencing and looking for a solution….”

How many of us are willing to do that (switch to a light phone, or employ other technology-limiting guidelines upon ourselves), even as a temporary experiment?  What would we find out about ourselves, and our attention spans, if we did?

There seems to be proponents and opponents and studies done on all sides of this  multifaceted issue – I’ve included the above excerpt as a teaser in hopes that y’all will listen to the entire episode.   Moiself  would love your applicable comments and opinions on the matter…but if it takes longer than 60 seconds to read them, I’ll probably move onto something else.

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of A Plea, For This Holiday, And Beyond….

Consider the turkey, if you will.

 

 

“This is an important issue. We’re talking about over 200 million turkeys who are reared in a way that comes close to being described as torture. It hurts them to stand up because their immature leg bones don’t bear the immense weight that they’ve been bred to put on in a short time.
They suffer at slaughter and, as I describe in the book, if they get bird flu, the entire shed is killed by heatstroke quite commonly. It’s not the only method used in the United States, but it’s used on millions of birds. The ventilation is stopped in the shed, heaters are brought in, and they are deliberately heated to death over a period of hours. That’s something that Americans don’t know, and it’s important they should know, because it should stop.”

( NY Times The Interview:
Peter Singer Wants To Shatter Your Moral Complacency.”  )

 

 

Sometimes, when considering the never-ending ongoing Middle East Situation ®, and how nations which continue expanding their oil production as if global warming is what happens to other planets, and the host of other life shit buckets “challenges” we face, I feel almost beyond despondent.

If you strive to live an ethical life (and moiself  does), one of the aims of that life is to reduce suffering when you can.  So many things seem totally beyond my control; I moiself  cannot get Vladimir Putin to stop poisoning his opponents, or even convince a modicum of my own countrymen to stop voting like self-interested, dictatorial, xenophobic, sexist ignoramuses on the chance that a serial liar and convicted con artist might lower their gasoline prices.  But I can control what I eat; I can control what products I “consume.”

 

 

I can’t speak for y’all, but it is difficult for moiself  to pretend to *not* know something once I know it ( damnit ).    [4]  I’m not alone in this.  Still, many of us who consider ourselves to be Good People ®  – the kind of people who, even if we are meat eaters, would never, say, stomp on a  turkey chick – continue to *not* educate ourselves about where that meat comes from and what is the life of the mass-produced/industrial farming animals whose flesh we consume.  Let’s face it, we don’t wanna do better.  At least, not all the time, and not when the doing better  has to do with eliminating or altering something we considered a family and/or cultural tradition, like eating turkey on Thanksgiving.

 

 

…MH, moiself, and our offspring made winter trips to the (now closed) Flying L Ranch in Glenwood, WA, several years in a row.  During one such trip, as we drove past many farms and ranches in the mountainous, bucolic areas near Mt. Adams, we passed a field inhabited by a strange flock of creatures – what I thereafter referred to as
“The Raquel Welch/Pamela Anderson turkey commune.”   [5]


The turkeys were grotesquely-shaped – each turkey looked as if it consisted of ginormous gazongas topped with a tiny head – and acted like zombies.  Yes, they were outside, in a field (no doubt so the turkey rancher could claim that they were “free range”).  But they might as well have been locked up in a brood house; they could not take advantage of being in a field, because they did not move – essentially, they could not move.  I had MH stop the car and we watched them for a while; it was funny at first (only one of them attempted movement, which caused it to topple over on its face), then disturbing.

Upon returning home I did some research.  The turkeys were immobile, like statues, because they’d been bred to grow an excess of breast tissue – the white meat turkey consumers prefer, by a large margin, over the dark leg meat.  The turkeys have been bred to do this and to do it quickly, and their rapid, distorted weight gain means that:

* they can no longer reproduce naturally ;   [6]

* their legs cannot support their body mass.

The turkeys become crippled by their own weight, and cannot move without enormous effort.  Although, when raised in factory farm conditions, there is nowhere to move to:  thousands of turkeys are packed into dark, poorly-ventilated sheds and warehouses in cramped quarters (less than 4 square feet of space per bird).  To keep the crowded birds from scratching and pecking each other, workers mutilate the turkeys: they amputate parts of the turkeys’ toes and upper beaks with hot blades and slice off the males’ snoods.    [7]  No local anesthetics/pain relievers are used during these procedures.

 

 

People who raise and work with wild turkeys, domestic non-factory turkeys and rescued factory turkeys attest to how turkeys are gentle, intelligent, and family-oriented.  In natural conditions, turkey hens are devoted mothers who care diligently for their chicks ( poults ), which learn crucial survival information from their mother, including social behaviors.

When I lived in the Bay Area I regularly went hiking in the Rancho San Antonio Wilderness Preserve.  There was an educational farm sharing trail space with the preserve, and I remember “meeting” a turkey which lived on that farm.  After that first encounter I would always stop by the farm whenever I came to the preserve, and more often than not that turkey woud be there, and run over to the fence to “greet” me.  I was astounded by how beautiful I thought it was – I’d never heard a turkey described as beautiful – and by how it seemed to enjoy and solicit my attention (even though I had no food to give it).  Thus, I was not surprised when I read about these basic (but little known) turkey facts:

* Turkeys are social animals.
They enjoy the company of other creatures, including humans.

* Turkeys can recognize each other by their voices,
and more than 20 unique vocalizations have been identified in wild turkeys.

* Turkeys are incredibly curious and inquisitive animals who enjoy exploring.

* Turkeys are highly intelligent animals who, just like the dogs and cats in our homes, are playful individuals with unique personalities.

* Turkeys form strong social bonds and show affection towards one another.

* Turkeys are gentle creatures who enjoy socializing with human companions
and protecting other turkeys with whom they’ve bonded.

* In the wild, mother Turkeys naturally raise their chicks for five months
and fiercely protect them from danger.

* The natural lifespan of the turkey is up to 10 years
( excerpt from Ten Facts About Turkeys, Four Paws in the US )

But, along the lines of being bred for physical deformities the turkey industry would have you believe that all emotion and intelligence have been bred out of domestic turkeys.   Don’t fall for these harmful myths; watch this four minute clip (here ), or search for other videos taken by people who work with such birds, and you can see their relationships with rescued factory farm turkeys.

 

 

Here is the life of that golden brown carcass who, post mortem, is the centerpiece of your traditional Thanksgiving meal:

* Sit
* stand if you can
* eat
* get slaughtered when you are three to five months old
( after enduring the abuse of the factory farm workers, who’ve been documented
torturing, maiming and killing the miserable birds under their control ).

 

 

But we like our full stomachs and our traditions, don’t we?  Most of us have no interest in educating ourselves about “…the grim, unnatural life cycle of turkeys raised for meat and the unrelenting torment they face from hatching to slaughter.”    We may nod in acknowledgement that, alas, turkeys, like most animals raised for food, have a miserable life…but at least we can hope they have a quick death?

Sorry. Those turkeys who survive the journey to the slaughterhouse (many die on the way, jammed into crowded trucks, transported with no food or water) are hung upside down by their (crippled) legs, then run through a disassembly line: first their heads are dragged through an electrified “stunning tank,” which is meant to immobilize them.  Those that manage to lift their heads up and avoid the stunning tank (which many try to do), are thus still conscious when their throats are slit. If the blade fails to cut the birds’ throats properly, they’re scalded alive in the tank of boiling water that’s used for feather removal.

Don’t take my word for it; the ASPCA,  PETA, and other animal rights organizations have documented the factory farm/slaughter house horror shows.   

Moiself  is going out for Tday with family and friends, to McMenamin’s Grand Lodge, as we did last year.   [8]   And although I  (and probably MH) will enjoy McMenamin’s yummers Holiday Vegan Plate option,    [9]  most of the other attendees will order the restaurant’s turkey dinner…and I will not  Debbie Downer  them for doing so (as fun as that might be).

 

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [10]

 

*   *   *

May we strive for a balance of information and attention;
May you be protective of your limited resources;
May you resist the temptation to do a Thanksgiving Debbie Downer
(but if you succumb and do a good one, send the documentation to moiself );
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] Not Amish; I don’t think they listen to podcasts.

[2] as in, making and receiving calls; no Google or anyone else’s maps, no internet surfing ability; no social media….  

[3] Stolen Focus: Why You Can’t Pay Attention, and How to Think Deeply Again.

[4] I understand the reasons we prefer to remain ignorant in certain matters.  We like our comfortable lives and don’t want to upset our routines or feel guilty about our favorite things.

[5] I realized, after son K and daughter Belle had no reaction to the Raquel Welch reference, I needed to update my go-to terms for preposterously-bosomed females.  And the Pamela Anderson reference is aging as well.

[6] Commercial turkeys are “artificially inseminated”: the industry euphemism for roughly restraining female turkeys, turning them upside down, and violently shoving tubes or syringes of semen into their vaginas. To collect the semen, workers known as “milkers” restrain male turkeys and forcibly masturbate them until they ejaculate.  One worker describes his brief stint at a turkey hen breeding facility in Missouri: “The birds were terrified, and beat their wings and struggled in panic…Having been through this week after week, the birds feared the chute and bulked and huddled up. The drivers literally kicked them into the chute…I have never done such hard, dirty, disgusting work in my life: 10 hours of pushing birds, grabbing birds, wrestling birds, jerking them upside down, pushing open their vents, dodging their panic-blown excrement and breathing the dust stirred up by terrified birds.”        ( Excerpt from “Twelve reasons you may never want to eat turkeys again.” )

[7] The snood is the flap of skin that runs from male turkey’s beak to its chest.

[8] And had great food and a great time, I highly recommend it.

[9] Field Roast Celebration Roast, veggie gravy, mashed red potatoes, garlic green beans, Fireside cranberry relish, and a dinner roll.

[10] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.  No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Events I’m Not Anxiously Awaiting

Comments Off on The Events I’m Not Anxiously Awaiting

Content Warning:  Possible Pettiness/Snark Zone Ahead

A local yoga studio occasionally does profiles on certain students and teachers, either posting them online or in emails.  Last week I received an email with a profile on one such student, who is also a certified yoga teacher (and who helps out around the studio with décor, etc.)

The profile began with a brief description of the student’s (“S”) background, and then listed her answers to three questions the studio had posed to her:

Q1:
What was your favorite part of summer?

S’s answer:
Buying a home in Costa Rica!….

Q2:
Do you have one important thing you’d love to do to by the end of 2024?

S’s answer:
I’ve been practicing non-attachment by minimizing a LOT of my material things, which has been very challenging…..

Moiself  didn’t even make it to the question 3, I was laughing so hard at the incongruity of answers 2 and 1.

 

*   *   *

Department Of Yet Another Great Hidden Brain Podcast

Which would be the latest, introduced thusly on the HB website:

“Every morning, you wake up and face the world. What does it look like to you? Do you see a paradise of endless opportunities, where people are friendly and helpful? Or a world filled with injustice, where people cannot be trusted? In the final installment of this year’s ITAL You 2.0 series, we talk with psychologist Jamil Zaki about how we become disillusioned and distrustful of the world, and how to balance realism with hope.”
( Hidden Brain podcast, You 2.0: Fighting Despair  )

Free thinker/humanist/religion-free person moiself  has long practiced taking a skeptical approach to any claims people make about the world, or declarations about what is the “proper” or “true” worldview.  I have described moiself   [1]   as a “cynical optimist.”  But after listening to the wise, thoughtful explanation of the guest, Stanford psychology professor and researcher Jamil Zaki, I think I’m more accurately described as…or will strive to be…a hopeful skeptic.

HB host Shankar Vidantam:
“…you talk about a concept called hopeful skepticism.
What is hopeful skepticism?”

Jamil Zaki:
“I think it’s first important to separate cynicism from skepticism, because these two are often confused with one another.  As we’ve been discussing, cynicism is the theory that others are greedy, selfish, and dishonest.  Skepticism is really quite different – it’s a desire to have evidence to support our beliefs, and to not simply accept our assumptions about the world.
The ideal of hopeful skepticism is twofold:  one is being open to evidence the way that scientists are, but two, it’s understanding that our default is relatively negative, and often too negative.  We often miss the goodness in others even when it’s there.  So, hopeful skepticism is an openness to the world that is complemented by the idea that, ‘Hey, people are probably better than I think, and if I pay attention, pleasant surprises may be everywhere.’ “

 

 

*   *   *

  Department Of Yes, I Am Dutifully Employed By The
Policing-Artificial-Intelligence-Adverb-Usage Squad ®

Because I follow Australian singer/composer/polymath Tim Minchin on Facebook, I received a post about his new book, You Don’t Have to Have a Dream: And Other Life Lessons.  I had already decided to pre-order the book, but because this is the way of our world, along with the post there was the following take from Meta-AI, Facebook’s dreadful, new (to moiself ) analysis/summary of the comments on the post (my emphases).   [2]

“META  AI: what people are saying:
Fans congratulate Tim Minchin on his success, eagerly awaiting signed copies and upcoming shows. Many have already read the book, while others anxiously await its release on Audible and in Canada.  Enthusiasm and support abound.”

Gee, META AI, you left out, “… And hijinxs ensue.”    [3]

 

 

Seriously, ladies and germs, far be it from me to take issue with a summary/interpretation of comments I haven’t even read, but…you know I will.  Is this AI’s phrasing, or did people really write that they are anxiously awaiting the book’s release? Wouldn’t, “eagerly awaiting” be a more apt description for fans looking forward to a book release, or any upcoming event?

I associate being eager about something with positive emotions, as in, with wanting to do something, or very much wanting to have something (as in, longing, wishing, hoping and/or hopeful, desirous of, keen, enthusiastic…).  However, being anxious about something ( in moiself’s  eyes ) is not a pleasant experience.  Let’s see what the Oxford dictionary says:

anx·ious  /ˈaNG(k)SHəs/    adjective

1. experiencing worry, unease, or nervousness, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome.
“she was extremely anxious about her exams”

2. wanting something very much, typically with a feeling of unease.
“the company was anxious to avoid any trouble”

 

I love it when I can cite something British so support moiself.

 

 

If there are Tim Minchin fans who are truly  anxious about his book’s release, is it because they think he mentions them unfavorably in it?  If so, perhaps they shouldn’t read it.  If they are  anxious about it for any other reason…hmmmmm.  If you are truly anxious about the upcoming work of an entertainer, perhaps what you should anxiously await is an appointment for therapy, or just find a hobby,  get outside more, take a walk, whatever… Just sayin.’

*   *   *

Department Of What Is Wrong With (Some) People?

As in the Some People involved in the Varsity Blues scandal. The scandal was so nicknamed by the press as per the 2019 federal investigation, nicknamed “Operation Varsity Blues,” which led to charges brought against over 50 parents, coaches, exam administrators – and the head of a bogus university entrance coaching foundation who masterminded the scheme, which involved wealthy parents paying to have their children’s college entrance-exam scores rigged and securing athletic-recruit status, for elite and prestigious universities and college, via providing fraudulent records and bribery to university employees.

 

 

Confession:  I didn’t follow the story at the time it broke, but recently I found moiself  fascinated by it…in that way one can be fascinated by looking at something which is also rather repulsive, such as the partially gutted carcass of a dead sea mammal that has been washed up on the shore and stranded there after a high tide, and although you are somewhat repelled by the sight you are also strangely attracted to it as you slowly approach it and stare, your mind performing some half-assed necropsy as to what could’ve caused the injuries – shark attack? Boat propeller?    [4]

Dateline: last Saturday morning; 6 AM; having finished my morning games; scrolling the  LA Times headlines…which is a bad habit     [5]   moiself  has mostly successfully overcome, but for some reason I find the stories on the LA Times app different from those on my other news apps, and particularly compelling in terms of their feature articles and follow up stories that do not upset me in the way that other news venues tend to do…

 

Once again, I digress.

The LAT had several follow-up articles on the Varsity Blues scandal, which contained links to earlier stories the newspaper had done on the wealthy and famous parents who were either convicted or pled guilty to charges of fraud, including an article on the actor Felicity Huffman’s involvement:

Felicity Huffman says college admissions scandal
was ‘only option’ to help her daughter
.”

 

 

Reading this particular story I found myself plagued by unanswerable questions regarding Huffman – I am addressing the questions to her because she was featured in (as in, had agreed to be interviewed for) one of the articles.  But these questions are for all of the wealthy, influential and celebrity parents who participated in that college admissions scam:

WTF is wrong with you?!?!?!

As in, I was gobsmacked by Huffman’s obtuse, is-it-more-horrible-or-ludicrous?,  statement/confession/excuse, that participating in the college admission scandal was the “only option” to help her daughter.

I understand that many parents, especially parents in the upper societal strata of power and fame, can get their designer undies in a knot re securing their child’s admission to “the best” (read: elite and prestigious) colleges…but have such people always been so self-entitled, deluded, and classist?  Didn’t at least some of them come from middle-class or even lower-class backgrounds?

Moiself  recalls that several of the famous people involved in the Varsity blues scandal had previously been involved in progressive political causes and/or supporting charities that help needy or “marginalized” people.  I wanted to ask these celebrities, did you ever consider what are the options for those people for whom you lobby and attend protest marches – did you consider their reaction when you dared to prounounce that cheating to secure your daughter’s admission to an elite school was the only option for her?  What about the millions of people across the country – as in , 95.7% of us – who somehow manage to live happy, successful, ethical lives despite having NOT gone to elite colleges?   What about the millions of people across the country who go to state-supported institutions, trade schools, community colleges, or find their way without their parents, cheating, and bribing on their behalf in life without going to college at all?

 

 

Cheating and bribery was the only option to secure your child’s future?  What an ass-flapping, slap in the face to anyone without the resources of wealth and fame to stack the deck for their child,   [6]   and to anyone with the modicum of decency it would take to realize that even if they were to procure their child’s admission to a snob school an elite institution, the ethical ramifications of having done so would affectively erase any advantages they wanted to secure for their child.

“Felicity Huffman knows she took extreme and illegal measures to ensure her daughter’s academic success. But the actor says that she ‘felt like I would be a bad mother if I didn’t do it.’ “
(excerpt from above article)

What kind of drugs, other than those of power and prestige, would a person have to be ingesting to attempt to justify, to themselves or others (or to their sentencing judge), that they thought they would be a *bad parent* if they didn’t try to cheat to secure advantages for their child?

I understand that the masterminds of the scandal ( Rick Singer and the other “educational consultants” hired by the celebrity and wealthy clients) used psychological pressure and manipulation to convince their clients that bribing university was ‘the only way” to secure their children’s admission to prestigious universities.  But what about those parents’ – any parents’ – responsibility to be an example to their children, to be a fucking decent human being, and not fall for such elitist bullshit?

” ‘It felt like I had to give my daughter a chance at a future,’ (Huffman) told ABC7’s Marc Brown in an interview that aired Thursday.  ‘So it was sort of like my daughter’s future, which meant I had to break the law.’ ”
(excerpt from above article)

 

Really? Do you hear yourself when you speak?

 

Yep, here sits moiself  and other like-minded peons, judging those celebrities for breaking the laws that never occurred to us to break, because, somehow, we were able to give our poor little waifs “a chance at a future” without bribing college admission officials and falsifying our children’s SAT scores and fabricating our children’s prowess in sports they never participated in.

So many questions had moiself, while reading those articles…and perhaps the most important question should have been asked of moiself Why am I reading this?  Why am I reading this when – like those parents involved in the scandal – I should know better?  I know that reading those articles will ultimately provide no answers, and will cause me to start my day in a state of,  WTF is wrong with those people?!?!?!?!?!?!  twitterpation.     [7]

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [8]

 

*   *   *

 

May you one day find the answer to what is wrong with some people?;
May your hopeful skepticism allow for pleasant surprises everywhere;
May you be eagerly (but not anxiously) waiting these upcoming blog posts;

…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] To those who have asked.  Plus, to strangers on public transit.

[2] Meta-AI provides the so-you-don’t-have-to-read-through-them summary/analysis of post’ comments…not that you ever read through the comments anyway, or cared what other people think….

[3] Did you get the clever self-reference, to my blog signoff – didja, didja, huh, huh?

[4] the specificity of this example is for a reason: I walk on the beach, a lot.

[5] bad for me, that is, in terms of setting my mood, insanity, and anxiety levels for the rest of the day.

[6] Or for those who had the wealth, fame, and privilege, but would never dream of cheating.

[7] And another footnote will not help.

[8] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.    No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Text Translations I’m Not Editing

Comments Off on The Text Translations I’m Not Editing

Department Of Moiself  Could Do Much Better.  So, I Did.

The 26 across clue for the New York Times Saturday crossword puzzle was “a bad look.”  Neither MH nor I thought it was a good match for the answer to 26 across, which turned out to be, “the eye.”

Say what?

According to a study I just made up, everybody knows that a bad look is not  the eye, it’s the evil eye, or the stink eye, et al.  We both agreed that the phrase the eye is rarely used, but when it is, it may be neutral as in, that person‘s giving you the eye, as in, they’re checking you out, perhaps in a curious or flattering way (because they find you interesting or attractive)…but it isn’t necessarily “bad.”

The Saturday NYT crosswords are the most difficult of the week, often incorporating obscure clues and/or answers.  Thus, I was proud of moiself  for coming up with what I thought would be the perfect Saturday (difficult/obscure) crossword clue, if you want the answer to be, the eye.

Clue:  “___ ___ of Laura Mars” (if she only had one).    [1]

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Siri (Or Whatever Is Listening) Doesn’t Like How I Enunciate

…a phenomenon for which I am mostly grateful, in that it often provides moiself  (and my fortunate/unfortunate textees) with cheap entertainment.

Category: Best Mistranslation Of The Year.    [2] 

Dateline:  Saturday, late morning.  Moiself  has been exchanging texts with friend LH, whom I invited to Sunday dinner and with whom I’ve been discussing menu possibilities:

What was spoken/dictated, by moiself:
“…you’re a yes for dinner?”

What was translated as a text:
“…your ass for dinner?”

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of  And The Oscar Goes To…

The afore-mentioned mistranslation blooper is, so far, runner up for  Best Mistranslated Text Ever.  First place goes to a text of mine from of years past.  Setting:  MH and I were on a crowded light rail train.  I received a text from friend JWW, asking if she could come over to our house to collect some plants MH had promised her, for her yard.  I dictated my answer, letting her know that we were not at home, and that I was texting from the Max train, as we were on our way to Portland.

What was spoken, by moiself:
“…we’re on our way to attend the Portland Folk Festival.”

What was translated:
“…we’re on our way to attend the Portland Fuck Festival.”

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of A Book To Distract From Politics

After reading Patrick Stewart’s recent memoir, Making It So, I’ve been thinking about moiself’s  favorite Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes, after Stewart named his.   [3]   As of this moment, they are, in dyslexic alphabetical order (with commentary by guest commentator, moiself )

* The Inner Light
(an entire life lived in 20 minutes – even sci fi legend Ursula Le Guin was impressed  [4] )

* Yesterday’s Enterprise
( introducing arguably    [5]  the bravest fictional captain ever: Rachel Garrett)

* The Best of Both Worlds, Parts 1 & 2
(featuring the creepiest, most unnerving of enemies, The Borg)

 

 

* The Face of the Enemy
( Kidnapped Troi walks a razor’s edge to help resistance fighters )

* The Offspring
( Data “loves” and loses a child of his own creation)

* The Host
(Dr. Crusher loves and loses a person of a symbiotic species)

* Reunion
(More love and loss: Klingon politics; Worf and his valiant ex-with-a-secret)

 

 

* I, Borg
(Geordi makes me hate the Borg a little bit less….[6]   )

* Lower Decks
(A welcome focus on junior officers; a noble sacrifice from one of them)

* Sarek
(The aging diplomat battles dementia with Picard’s mind-meld help )

* Unification Parts 1 & 2
(Has ST legend Spock gone rogue trying to help Romulan dissidents?)

* Data’s Day
( A Vulcan Ambassador/spy; Data learns to tap dance)

 

 

* Manhunt
(Lwaxana Troi chews scenery and saves a peace conference from terrorists)

* Starship Mine
(aka “Die Hard Picard,” but Data’s attempts at small talk steal the show)

* Ensign Ro
(The “difficult” Bajoran terrorist with a poignant backstory)

* Cost of Living
(Flamboyancy hiding her loneliness, Lwaxana Troi mentors Worf’s son)

 


Featuring one of Worf’s best lines, re the experience of taking a mud bath  [7]

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [8]

 

*   *   *

Parting Shot:  I love it when/I hate it when…

I love it when moiself  watches a show I’ve seen a bajillion times before, and at a particularly poignant moment, even though I know *exactly* what’s ahead, I still cannot stop myself from crying.

 

 

*   *   *

May you never serve…uh, you know what…for Sunday dinner;
May you send the NY Times crossword editor your own “better” clues;
May you enjoy a good cry from your own favorite poignant TV episode;

…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

 

*   *   *

[1] Taken from the title of the 1978 Faye Dunaway movie, The Eyes Of Laura Mars.

[2] Hey, the year ain’t over yet.

[3] No surprise to ST fans, it was The Inner Light.

[4] Le Guin praised the series, and that Hugo Award-winning episode in particular, in her 1994 essay for TV Guide.

[5]   As in, if you were to argue with me about it, which would be a waste of time but hey, it’s your life.

[6] But they still should have taken the opportunity to destroy/weaken the collective, IMO.

[7] “You’re just supposed to *sit* here?!”

[8] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Facial Recognition I’m Not Matching

Comments Off on The Facial Recognition I’m Not Matching

Department Of The Partridge Of The Week

It’s that time of the year again. As has become a tradition much maligned anticipated in our neighborhood, moiself  is hosting a different Partridge, every week, in my front yard.   [1]

Can you identify this week’s guest Partridge?

 

*   *   *

Department Of My Favorite Week Of The Year

It used to be this week – the days after Christmas and before January 1.  Much of the holiday pressure is gone (except if you are foolish brave enough to be hosting a NYE gathering), and you can just relax and enjoy, do some winter wonderland walking/hiking, hang out with friends and family….  And no one seems to take work so seriously   [2]  during this lame-duck-week of the year.

Or, you can be like moiself  and battle a nasty head cold.

I’ve been dealing with a simple head cold for a week; no fever, negative COVID test – same symptoms but now, with fever.  My California friends have told me that “everyone” there is getting sick with rhinoviruses and enteroviruses that hang on for some time (and there was an article in this morning’s LA Times about it).  Seeing as how the illnesses are viral, there isn’t much you can do about them besides home care…which, I admit I’d *not* been doing, since I didn’t feel “that bad.”

 

 

I guess this is my body’s way of saying, “Look, just stay in bed for one whole day and watch game shows and old westerns on the GRIT channel.”

Moiself  actually was able to nap yesterday afternoon, and by nap I mean hallucinate upstairs in bed with the TV on, attaining consciousness up every now and then to see that my temperature is 102.2 but at least I’m not in the courtroom of  Judge Judy , whom is dressing down yet another idiot who speaks out of turn/offers hearsay as testimony and generally comes to court woefully unprepared. 

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of My Last (Blog) Complaint Of The Year
Sub-Department of when AI stands for AAII ayyiyiyiyi!!!!!

As in, Absolutely Abominably Incorrectly Identified.

“Time and again, facial recognition technology gets it wrong….

This technology still relies heavily on vast quantities of information that it is incapable of assessing for reliability. And, in many cases, that information is biased….

Georgetown University’s Center on Privacy & Technology noted that at least 26 states allow police officers to run or request to have facial recognition searches run against their driver’s license and ID databases….. given the disproportionate rate at which African Americans are subject to arrest, the center found that facial recognition systems that rely on mug shot databases are likely to include an equally disproportionate number of African Americans.

More disturbingly, facial recognition software is significantly less reliable for Black and Asian people, who, according to a study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, were 10 to 100 times more likely to be misidentified than white people. The institute, along with other independent studies, found that the systems’ algorithms struggled to distinguish between facial structures and darker skin tones.

The use of such biased technology has had real-world consequences for innocent people throughout the country. To date, six people that we know of have reported being falsely accused of a crime following a facial recognition match — all six were Black.”

( ” When Artificial Intelligence Gets It Wrong:
Unregulated and untested AI technologies have put innocent people at risk of being wrongly convicted.”  The Innocence Project, 9-19-23 )

 

 

“Rite Aid has been banned from using facial recognition technology for five years over allegations that its surveillance system was used incorrectly to identify potential shoplifters, especially Black, Latino, Asian or female shoppers….

The FTC said in a federal court complaint that technology used by Rite Aid for several years led to thousands of incorrect matches, including an incident where Rite Aid store employees stopped and searched an 11-year-old girl.

Rite Aid used facial recognition technology in hundreds of stores from October 2012 to July 2020 to identify shoppers ‘it had previously deemed likely to engage in shoplifting or other criminal behavior,’ the FTC said. The company didn’t tell customers that it was using the technology.”

( excerpts from “Rite Aid banned from using facial recognition for 5 years after false theft accusations,” Oregonlive 12-20-23 )

 

 

This is the fear: imagine being “incorrectly identified” – as in, being accused of theft, or any crime you didn’t do – and then having to prove your innocence against AI identifying technology.  Most people have been brought up to assume,

“When where there’s smoke, there’s fire.”

The thing is, with our advances in technology (not all of which moiself  considers to be advances, as in, indicative of progress for civilization) there in fact may be no fire.  There isn’t even any smoke in the first place – it’s all CGI.

 

But if there is smoke and/or fire, I hope that Godzilla is somehow involved.

*   *   *

Department Of BTW

In two days, the last day of 2023, the date will be 123123.

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week    [3]

 

 

*   *   *

May you remember to take care of yourself when you’re sick;
May you enjoy the rest of 2023’s lame duck week;
May you look forward to a year free from AI mis-identifying;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] Specifically, in our pear tree.

[2] Or even show up for it.

[3] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Leash I’m Not Attached To

Comments Off on The Leash I’m Not Attached To

Department Of The Partridge Of The Week

It’s that time of the year again. As has become a tradition much maligned anticipated in our neighborhood moiself  is hosting a different Partridge, every week, in my front yard.   [1]

Can you identify this week’s guest Partridge?

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of I Should Have Known Better

 

 

Moiself  thought this comic – which I shared on Facebook – was funny.  Several of my religious-believer FB friends saw it as a witnessing opportunity, and thus commented on my post.

 

 

Interesting in that, whether feeling the need to explaining that “fear of hell” is not what brought them to their religion, or to note that “fortunately god is a forgiving god,” no poster wrote, “Oh there is no threat of hell in our faith,” nor cited their holy books or whatever to show that hell is a manmade concept.   [2]

As for believers who hold to the “forgiving” aspect of their deity, my reply/query is, “Well, then, why the theological threat of hell?  Why not just forgive?”  The fortunately-god-is-forgiving poster went on to admit his uncertainty, noting that (my emphases) he “…doesn’t know if [his god] forgives everyone but I am guessing and believe he forgives those that accept and believe in him.”

Still, again, that conditional forgiveness, and no refutation of the Christian teaching of a bad afterlife for non (Christian) believers.

One poster claimed that the comic’s “premise” was incorrect, because “The one who walks with Jesus has absolutely no fear of what happens after death….”

That was my favorite bit o’ equivocation.  Psssst – ma’am, your leash is showing.

Following the logic of that carefully-worded, skirting-of-the-issue claim, the one who *doesn’t* “walk with Jesus,” *does* have something to fear.

So, if instead of walking with Jesus, y’all…

* ambulate with Allah
* bounce with Buddha
* dance with Demetir
* dash with Dionysus
* frolic with Frigg
* gambol with Ganesha
* hop with Hera
* jog with Jehovah   [3]

 

 

* march with Mercury
* pace with Poseidon
*prance with Pele
* promenade with Persephone
* quiver with Quetzalcoatl
* run with Ra
* stroll with Saturn
* saunter with Shiva
* trot with Thor
* undulate with Urania
*waltz with wiccans
* zoom with Zoroaster

…y’all be on a hike to H-E-double-hockey-sticks.

Many Christians consider their Jesus to be the one who brought a “New Testament” of peace and love, and that the “Old Testament”   [4]   is the one for the fire and brimstone.  Sorry, but y’all need to familiarize yourself with the entirety of your scriptures, and not just the feel-good verses snipped out and read at baptisms and weddings.   Your so-called prince of peace   [5]   is the one who gave his followers hell.

 

 

JC gave us concepts like “eternal fire” (Matt. 25:41) and “eternal punishment” (Matt. 25:46).  Most contemporary Christian believers like to think of their JC of as kindness personified, instead of as the one who, in their holy book, promotes infinite torment:

“The Son of man [Jesus himself] shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity; And shall cast them into a furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.”
(Matt 13:41-42)
“And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched.” (Mark 9:43)

BTW, the burning of unbelievers during the Inquisition was based on the words of Jesus:

“If a man abides not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered;
and men gather them, and cast them into the fire, and they are burned.”
(John 15:6)

 

 

If y’all don’t trust a Happy Heathen ® like moiself  regarding what Christian scriptures say re JC’s teachings about hell, go to a true believer – Mike Livingston, pastor and missionary, content editor of a bible study course, and graduate of Jerry Fallwell’s clown college Liberty University.    [6]   Livingston has conveniently gathered JC’s hell teachings for you (warning: I’m not shouting at you, the all-caps are his):

“…much of what we know about hell comes from the mouth of Jesus. In fact, Jesus said more about hell than did any other biblical figure. Our understanding of hell ultimately derives from Him. So what can we know about hell from the teachings of Jesus?

HELL IS A REAL PLACE.
‘Don’t fear those who kill the body,’ Jesus said, ‘rather fear Him who is able to destroy both soul and body in hell’ (Matt 10:28; see also 5:29-30; 23:15,33; Luke 10:15; 16:23). Commenting on Jesus’ teaching about an ‘eternal punishment’ (Matt. 25:46),  (Baptist pastor and theologian) John Broadus wrote: ‘It is to the last degree improbable that the Great Teacher would have used an expression so inevitably suggesting a great doctrine he did not mean to teach.’ According to Jesus, hell is real.

HELL IS A PLACE OF JUDGMENT.
In numerous parables, Jesus clearly and emphatically taught of a final judgment and the separation of the righteous from the unrighteous. The unrighteous will be condemned to a place of blazing fire and utter darkness where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth. (See Matt. 13:24-30,36-43, 47-50; 22:1-14; 25:14-46.) Jesus called this place ‘the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels’ (Matt. 25:41). Hell is not a place where people are tormented by the devil; it is where those who reject God will suffer the same fate as the devil and his demons. It is the place of final judgment.

HELL IS FOREVER.
Jesus spoke of hell as ‘eternal fire’ (Matt. 25:41) and ‘eternal punishment’ (Matt. 25:46). In Matthew 25:46, the same word—eternal—is used to describe eternal life for the righteous and the eternal punishment of hell for the unrighteous. According to Jesus, hell will be eternal.

HELL IS MORE TERRIBLE THAN WE CAN IMAGINE.
The images of fire (Matt. 25:41), darkness (Matt. 8:12; 22:13; 25:30), the weeping and gnashing of teeth (Matt. 8:12; 13:42,50; 22:13; 24:51; 25:30; Luke 13:28), and being cut into pieces speak of the horror of hell.”

(  from explorethebible.com “What did Jesus say about hell?” )

 

Inquiring minds want to know:              what did Godzilla say about hell?

 

The term Sheol is used briefly in the Hebrew scriptures, in what scholars say is a poetic metaphor for death.  But it’s not referencing an afterlife, as no concept of hell exists in Judaism.”

“…ancient Jews traditionally did not believe the soul could exist at all apart from the body. On the contrary, for them, the soul was more like the ‘breath.’ The first human god created, Adam, began as a lump of clay; then god ‘breathed’ life into him (Genesis 2: 7). Adam remained alive until he stopped breathing. Then it was dust to dust, ashes to ashes.

Ancient Jews thought that was true of us all. When we stop breathing, our breath doesn’t go anywhere. It just stops. So too the ‘soul’ doesn’t continue on outside the body, subject to postmortem pleasure or pain. It doesn’t exist any longer.

The Hebrew Bible itself assumes that the dead are simply dead—that their body lies in the grave, and there is no consciousness, ever again. It is true that some poetic authors, for example in the Psalms, use the mysterious term ‘Sheol’ to describe a person’s new location. But in most instances Sheol is simply a synonym for ‘tomb’ or ‘grave.’ It’s not a place where someone actually goes.”

( excerpt from “What Jesus Really Said About Heaven and Hell”  time.com 5-8-20 )

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Yeah And By The Way….

Although it should be obvious that moiself  does not believe in a literal netherworld of torment, I have heard some hellish things about Black Friday shopping.

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week    [7]

 

*   *   *

May you avoid the one hell for which we have actual proof:
Black Friday shopping;
May you have fun with the comments in your FB posts;
May you stay tuned to see your favorite Partridge in our pear tree;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] Specifically, in our pear tree.

[2] Although, as one post commentor noted, most people’s ideas about hell come from Dante’s Inferno, the fourteen century Italian poet Dante Alighieri’s epic,.

[3] The Hebrew god, who, contrary to Christian theology, did not give birth to himself/his son as the messiah.

[4] Which can be considered insulting to Jews, so many modern Christians are encouraged by scholars to refer to the OT books as the “Hebrew Scriptures” or the “first testament.”

[5] Yeah, the one who is quoted in your scriptures as giving a plethora of decidedly unpeaceful advice and predictions, including:

“I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother-in-law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.” (Matt 10:35-36). “If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.” (Luke 14:26) 

[6]  “Bill Maher lambasted Liberty University, the Virginia religious university that has become a mandatory stop for Republican presidential candidates…. Maher noted that Liberty teaches ‘creation science,’ and the idea that earth was created 5,000 years ago. ‘This is a school you flunk out of when you get the answers right’….   ‘Liberty’s diploma may look real,’ Maher said, ‘but when you confuse a church with a school it mixes up the things you believe — religion — with the things we know — education. Then you start thinking that creationism is science, and gay aversion is psychology, and praying away hurricanes is meteorology.’ (excerpts from huffpo, “Bill Maher: Liberty university is not a real school“)

[7] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Party Poopers I’m Not Indulging

2 Comments

Department Of You Say, Po-tay-to, I say Po-tah-to;
You Say Collection, I Say Exploitation

Museums:

A. repositories of culture

B. an empire’s trophy cases

C. institutions for fencing stolen goods

D. guardians of history

My opinion of museums has gradually changed over the years, beginning way-back-when, while wandering through the Portland Art Museum.  Moiself  and a friend were viewing the museum’s current collections as well as travelling exhibitions of Northwest tribal masks and centuries-old Japanese tapestries.  The only information available regarding the respective collections were small signs posted on the walls and notations in the museum’s brochure, which attributed the artifacts as  “from the collection of _____” (insert wealthy person name).  I wondered aloud, “Is collection a code word for pirate booty?

I’ve been reminded of this during the past several weeks, listening to the Freakonomics podcast’s three-part series on art and museums: Stealing Art is Easy. Giving It Back Is Hard,  which I can summarize thusly:

If a work of art – from paintings, weavings, masks, pottery, to household artifacts – is in a British museum but was not crafted by contemporary or ancient inhabitants of England, it was likely plundered from its area of origin.   [1]

There seems to be little disagreement – from museum curators to art and cultural historians – on that statistic.  The catch is, should such works be repatriated, and if so, when and how and to whom?

 

 

How do you return an artifact to its country of origin when the origin may be disputed and/or the country no longer exists (e.g., the Benin Bronzes)?  Some museum curators, while acknowledging the sometimes bloody and brutal acquisition of such art, make the argument that to return so-called precious artifacts to countries that do not have the infrastructure to house them safely in museums is somehow a waste to all humanity – which can be interpreted as a dog whistle for the racist and colonialist justification for stealing acquiring the artifacts in the first place (“These people aren’t sophisticated enough to care for their own art”).

The three episodes of this series (The Case of the $4 Million Gold Coffin; Is a Museum Just a Trophy Case?; How To Return Stolen Art) address the complexities of these logistically and ethically thorny dilemmas, whether the art in question was obtained from centuries-old European colonial raids or via the present stolen antiquities markets in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States.  I highly recommend that anyone who has ever visited any museum listen, and consider the issues.

 

“You call that art? My five-year-old could have looted that.”

*    *    *

Department Of Right-Wing RCers Don’t Hear Themselves When They Talk, Do They?

LA Pride   [2] and other organizations invited to the tenth annual LA Dodgers Pride Night are boycotting or reconsidering their participation in the event, after one of their sister organizations was disinvited from the festivities.

“The Los Angeles chapter of The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence—a charity that raises money for LGBTQ causes and performs in in drag dressed as nuns—were initially set to receive the Community Hero Award in honor of their community service and promotion of human rights.

The Dodgers announced it would remove the Sisters from its honorees on Wednesday, citing the ‘strong feelings of people who have been offended by the Sisters’ inclusion.’
( excerpts from “L.A. Dodgers’ Pride Night Controversy Explained: Why LGBTQ Groups, Politicians And Certain Catholics Are Slamming Team,”
Forbes, 5-19-23 )

 

 

Until this ruckus came to light, I didn’t know there was a Los Angeles chapter of the SPI.

If you are or have been a SF and/or Bay Area resident, a frequent visitor to San Francisco, or just a fan of the city,     [3]   you may be familiar with the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.  The Sisters were founded in San Francisco by several gay men over 40 years ago.  What began as street theater –

(Sister members include “Sister Tilda Nextime,” “Sister Viscous Power Hungry Bitch,” “Sister Missionary Position,” “Sister Adora Penthouse View,” “Sister Bambi Dextrous,” and moiself’s  favorite, “Sister Shalita Corndog”) –

soon became a nonprofit charitable organization.

 

 Their mission statement, as per their website:

The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence® are a leading-edge Order of queer and trans nuns. We believe all people have a right to express their unique joy and beauty.
Since our first appearance in San Francisco on Easter Sunday, 1979, the Sisters have devoted ourselves to community service, ministry and outreach to those on the edges, and to promoting human rights, respect for diversity and spiritual enlightenment.
We use humor and irreverent wit to expose the forces of bigotry, complacency and guilt that chain the human spirit.

So: the SPI were invited to this years LA Dodgers Pride Night, and some conservative RC defenders got their papal panties in a knot.

“…outcry over the ‘drag nuns’ began in the Midwest, with a call-in campaign led by the conservative advocacy organization CatholicVote. At the urging of the organization’s president, Brian Burch, followers flooded the ball club with outraged messages over plans to honor the Los Angeles Sisters with the Community Heroes Award at the team’s 10th annual Pride Night on June 16.
‘The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence are an anti-Catholic hate group which exists to desecrate and degrade the Catholic faith,’ Burch wrote in an open letter to the baseball commissioner….”
(excerpts from “The Dodgers booted the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence…”
LA Times, 5-19-23)

 

 

The nerve.  The absolute, unmitigated gall.

No one has desecrated – and nothing can desecrate and degrade –
the Catholic Church
more than its own history and behavior.

The church, from its highest representatives to its obtusely loyal parishioners, has no authority to speak on matters of “desecration.” The church itself has been a Brotherhood of Perpetual Indulgence for decades (if not centuries) of indulging rapists, abusers, and pedophiles within their ranks, turning a blind eye to the depredations and reassigning/transferring the criminals within their ranks, while ignoring, and/or shaming and attempting to silence those who sought justice. In the Los Angeles Diocese alone, the Catholic church has paid $660 million to settle 508 sexual abuse cases.

So I say, not only invite everybody to the party, let every night be Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence Night ® at Dodger Stadium.

 

Batter up!

 

And, in breaking news, it appears the LA Dodgers agree:

Column:  The Dodgers faltered by disinviting the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence but came to their senses (LA Times 5-23)

*   *   *

Department Of A Recommendation To Do Something
You Probably Haven’t Done
In A Long Time

That would be, moiself  recommends y’all rewatch   [4]  the 1970 disaster movie classic, Airport. I’d seen it decades ago, and forgotten most about it except to know that it was the primary inspiration for the Zucker-Abrams-Zucker (ZAZ) parody movie, Airplane, after which it took a long time for anyone – from movie producers to the ticket-buying public – to take any disaster movie seriously.    [5]   

Dateline: Monday circa 7 am;  warming up on my elliptical machine before my yoga class, trying to find something to watch (sans commercial interruption) to pass the time.  There it was, featured in the “For You”    [6]   section of my Netflix feed.  The opening segments of the movie…oh, my.  In the so-bad-it’s-good category, I found the movie’s deadpan solemnity to be sidesplitting, and almost missed my yoga class.

I had totally forgotten how many establishing shots of Airport, scene by scene, are almost indistinguishable from the spoof.  The ZAZ team must’ve had that movie running simultaneously as they were storyboarding their version. 

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Podcast Gardening

As regular readers of this blog know, I often write about podcasts I’ve listened to. I have at least thirty in my phone’s podcast feed app, and the process of weeding out some and adding others is a never-ending project.

I don’t listen to every episode of every podcast, but if I find moiself  skipping several episodes of a podcast I reconsider its inclusion in my listening library.  The episodes I tend to skip are most often those hosted by celebrities (read: actors and/or stand-up comics), who offer enough interesting material to tempt me from the first listen or two, but which then and far too often spend too much time with what I call the “gush fest.”     [7]

Host:
“My guest is the renowned, the amazing and unbelievably talented, Emma Stagehamm. Emma, I *love* your work!!!! ”

Guest:
“And I love *your* work!!!! “

Host:
“And I especially loved your work in the revival of the all-French mime production of Chekov’s ‘The Seagull’ !!!! ”

Guest:
“And I thought your work was brilliant in the off-Broadway, Star Wars-inspired
 political thriller, ‘The Mandalorian Candidate’ !!!!!!!!!!!!! “

Ad repeatum nauseum.

Yeah, yeah, you’ve done work; he’s done work; she’s done work; most of Hollywood has had work done;    [8]   they’ve done work – all gawd’s chilluns done work.  Please, spare me the seemingly obligatory, opening-an-interview-with-a-fellow-celebrity-butt-snogging, and say something interesting.

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week    [9]

  “Convent: a place of retirement for women who wish for leisure
to meditate upon the sin of idleness.”

( Ambrose Bierce, American writer and satirist, The Devil’s Dictionary )

 

 

*   *   *

May you not be disinvited to an event at which you were to be honored;
May you consider museum collections with a fresh eye and an open heart;
May you surely enjoy old classics like Airport;     [10]

…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] And not necessarily by the usual suspects: European colonialists.  Locals often plundered “their own” artifacts, removing and hiding them, and later selling them to the highest bidders (e.g. the Egyptians who, during the Arab Spring uprising, who broke into museums and looted ).

[2] An LGBTQ+ organization sponsoring or support community events in and around Los Angeles.

[3] Excuse me, The City.

[4] Or watch, as some of you may never have seen it.

[5] A disaster movie is “….a film genre that has an impending or ongoing disaster as its subject and primary plot device. …. these films usually feature some degree of build-up, the disaster itself, and sometimes the aftermath, usually from the point of view of specific individual characters or their families or portraying the survival tactics of different people.  These films often feature large casts of actors and multiple plot lines, focusing on the characters’ attempts to avert, escape or cope with the disaster and its aftermath. The genre came to particular prominence during the 1970s with the release of high-profile films such as Airport (1970), followed in quick succession by The Poseidon Adventure (1972), Earthquake (1974) and The Towering Inferno (1974).”  (excerpts from Wikipedia’s, disaster film entry )

[6] How did Netflix know?!?!?

[7] I’m talkin’ *you* Gates McFadden  and Tig Notaro.

[8] Did you catch the snarky plastic surgery reference? Didja, didja, didja, huh huh huh?

[9] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

[10] “And don’t call me Shirley.”

The Kosher (Electricity) I’m Not Keeping

1 Comment

Department Of Apropos Of Nothing…

Last night I dreamed I wrote an ode to “Avocado,” sung to the tune, “Desperado.” In my dream I was singing it, but come wake time I couldn’t remember the new lyrics I wrote.

 

Perhaps Abby, my Emotional Support Avocado, will help me remember.

 

*   *   *

Department Of Random Thoughts From Last Week

Darteline:  Monday afternoon, circa 3pm; caught in a sudden downpour – the proverbial cloudburst –  while driving home from a movie theater.  The rain is coming down so hard and blinding my wipers are on full speed and it’s still very difficult to see the road ahead of me.  Moiself  is able to make out the silhouette of a motorcycle in front of me, and for the first time in my life, I find moiself  wondering how motorcyclists navigate under similar conditions.  Do the visors on their helmets have wipers?  How do they prevent their visors from fogging up?

I googled “motorcycle helmet with rain wiper,” and for some reason this image appeared.  I’m thinking, maybe not the cutting edge in road safety?

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Religion’s Gift To The World

Regular readers of this blog (and other persons less emotionally disturbed) know that moiself  has no qualms when it comes to quarreling with the absurdities of the faith traditions and practices I grew up with (read: Christianity).  But, despite a certain religion having given the world centuries of comic-worthy material moiself  had mostly kept away from doing the same with Judaism.  Until a juicy nugget, in the form of a story about Israel’s utility classification and manipulation, fell into my petty hands….

Of course I’m not making up the following – there’s no need to.  Because, religion.

 

 

( Excerpts from  “Israel readies ‘kosher electricity’ for ultra-Orthodox households” (Washington Post, 5-7-23)
“Religious Israelis may soon have access to electric power that rabbis have approved for use during the weekly Sabbath, a techno-spiritual innovation that reflects…the power of ultra-Orthodox parties in Israel’s new government.
The program, unofficially dubbed ‘kosher electricity,’…would direct the national power utility to build…massive battery banks in and around ultra-Orthodox communities. These batteries would top up through the week with electricity from the public utility and dispense it during Shabbat hours, providing a workaround to rabbinical rules against plugging into the national grid from sundown on Fridays to sundown on Saturdays….”

Because it’s okay to enjoy the benefits of electrically powered appliances, but their devious little switches, look out!  THOU SHALT NOT TOUCH – it’s WORK.

 

“Not to worry; it’s clap on, clap off.”

 

This antediluvian foolishness aside, it’s one thing to live in a world of primitive superstitions and subjugate yourself to Bronze Age rites and red tape.  It’s another thing to demand that your fellow citizens make allowances for you *and* pay for you to do so:

“Since Israel’s founding, the ultra-Orthodox – also called the Haredimhave been exempted from military service, which is mandatory for all Jewish Israeli school leavers. The various ultra-Orthodox sects see it as a religious commandment to only study Jewish texts and separate themselves from modern society. They consequently receive government subsidies to study rather than work, along with general social services and benefits relating to unemployment, poverty and their large numbers of children.
( How anger over taxes and conscription is widening split among Israel’s Jews,”
The Guardian; my emphases )

 

Yahweh knows we can’t pick up our welfare checks if we’re in boot camp or practicing tank drills.

 

“Thousands marched for a ‘Day of Disruption to Demand Equality’ focused on the unequal burdens of citizenship and status of the ultra-Orthodox….
Ultra-Orthodox citizens are largely shielded from the country’s mandatory draft and educational standards and their families benefit from heavy public subsidies that allow boys and men to devote years to religious study instead of working and paying taxes in the mainstream economy….

One man marching in the ultra-Orthodox city of Bnei Brak wore a slogan that translated as ‘My son is willing to die on his tank; your son will not die studying Torah’…

‘They are not carrying with us, they are not part of society,” said Dafna Goldenberg, who served in a tank unit in the 1980s…. ‘I’m deeply worried that it will all collapse.’
(excerpts from “Israelis call out perks for ultra-Orthodox in latest protests,”
The Washington Post )

The ultra-Orthodox are the fastest-growing demographic in Israel, and the most insistent in pushing Israel’s government toward an even more hawkish, pro-military action, anti-Palestinian agenda.  Yet the Haredim expect (even insist) that everyone but them do the dirty work.  [1]   IMO it’s going to be a major factor in Israel’s inevitable downfall.   [2]

 

“Will the last person leaving Bnei Brak please ask his Shabbos goy to turn off the synagogue’s kosher lights?”

 

*   *   *

Department Of The Blog I Had To Stop Listening To

That would be the recent episode – Success 2.0: Taking the Leap of one of my favorite blogs, Hidden Brain.  The episode is introduced thusly (my emphases):

“American culture celebrates those who persevere in the face of adversity. So how do we know when to walk away from something that’s not working? Today, we kick off our new “Success 2.0” series with economist John List. He says in every domain of our lives, it’s important to know when to pivot to something new.”

After going through some legislative/corporate/business examples of should-I-stay-or-should-I-go? Should-we-fight-for-this-or-switch-tactics? dilemmas, guest List gave an example from his own life, of when he experienced the same predicament re his dissatisfaction with his marriage to his former high school sweetheart.

John List:
“This really caused me to step back, and think about whether I should end the marriage.  And I started to think, “Well look, I have five kids…and I’ve invested a lot in this relationship and this family, and I don’t want to waste that…so I  decided to give it a go.
And the next few months were difficult, and by the time the summer rolled around I was holed up mentally, I was keeping everything in, I was making occasional snide comments, to my wife – I really wasn’t a great husband or father.  So I said, ‘Well, give it some more time,’ and then six more months went by and I found myself even more miserable and making my wife’s life miserable…and that’s when I asked for a divorce.
This of course was a very difficult decision, as it went against everything I had been taught…and I really felt it was important to keep the family intake, especially for the kids, and I just realized that I was growing tired of making the rest of the family suffer during these dreadful times, and that’s when I decided to ask for a divorce….”

Oooohhhh…ick.  Really?

His whiny self-justification made me wanna….

 

 

“I was growing tired of making the rest of the family suffer.”  Well, then, stop making them suffer – that’ll be one less thing to make you tired. (And his kids were suffering?  Duh. They were starting to realize that they had a self-absorbed asshole for a father).

“I found myself even more miserable.” What passive language.   [3]   You just happened to *find* yourself miserable?

No where in List’s story does he mention seeking counseling,    [4]  or doing any kind of active or introspective work to find out what had led him to the point that he would consider abandoning a long-time marriage and FIVE children.  Rather, he whines to himself about his own discontent.  Why didn’t this educator and author, “noted for his pioneering contributions to field experiments in economics,”    [5]   turn his supposedly keen analytical mind to the most important field “experiment” of all – that of raising and nurturing a family?

When it comes to marriage and relationships, moiself  is in no way one of those *suck it up and be miserable no matter what the cost* people.  Still…we’re not talking about a corporate ad campaign that needs to be retooled or dumped, or a legislative initiative that needs to be tabled.  We’re talking “pivoting to something new” as in leaving your wife and your children?  As in, your family; your people – not corporations or career or educational plans. Human beings. A bit more difficult to just walk away from when “it isn’t working,” and rightly so.

 

 

List whimpers about being unhappy and moping for six months and making everyone else in his family unhappy.  Dude, do the work.  Find out what caused your attitude.  Do whatever you have to do to stop sulking and making others unhappy, instead of using their unhappiness – which you admit you caused – to justify your decision.  Yep, I’m calling List out, without further or in-depth knowledge of his personal story, but he’s the one who told his story in such a shallow, self-serving way.

From what I’ve read over the past couple of decades on this subject – from studies done by the organizations from the National Institute of Health to Psychology Today, to articles written by marriage and family counselors –  the evidence can be summed up in a headline I saw a few years ago.  Moiself  cannot recall the heading verbatim, but can summarize it:  Absent emotional or physical abuse, guess what – Your kids don’t care if *you’re* unfulfilled/bored/unhappy.  Kids want an intact family.

“Should You Stay Together Only for the Kids?

Many parents believe that divorce will cause irreparable damage to their children. Some parents are so worried about this that they remain in unhappy, conflict-ridden, or even abusive marriages. What does the research say? Is it always best to stay together for the kids?

The short-term answer is usually yes. Children thrive in predictable, secure families with two parents who love them and love each other. Separation is unsettling, stressful, and destabilizing unless there is parental abuse or conflict.”

(Psychology Today 5-29-19 )

 

 

*   *   *

 

 

Department Of,  And In A Related Story….

Dateline: Wednesday afternoon.  MH, working from home, walked downstairs from his office to my office, with a perplexed look on his face.  He told me he’d been catching up on some podcast listening while doing some mundane tasks, and he had a lot of Hidden Brain episodes in his podcast feed, and he started listening to a recent one in which the guest, a supposedly intelligent man, relayed a personal story which really put MH off by the man’s self-centered passivity and lack of self-awareness….

“Let me guess,” moiself  interjected.  “I bet it’s the podcast I’m blogging about this Friday.”

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of The Best Bumper Stickers I’ve Seen Recently…

Other than my current crop, of course.

 

 

The folllowing two, on the back of a burgundy minivan in front of me yesterday, made me pull over to the side of the road to laugh (and write them down):

My Driving Scares Me, Too

Condoms Prevent Minivans

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week    [6]

George Bush says he speaks to god every day, and Christians love him for it. If George Bush said he spoke to god through his hair dryer, they would think he was mad. I fail to see how the addition of a hair dryer makes it any more absurd.

( Neuroscientist, author and philosopher Sam Harris )

 

Are you there, god?  It’s me, Georgie.

 

*   *   *

May you savor the petty satisfaction of turning off a podcast which annoys you;
May your motorcycle helmet be both stylish and safety-enhancing;
May you relish the freedom to use electric appliances at any time of any day;

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] From serving in the military and harassing and killing Palestinian citizens, to hiring a shabbos goy to push a fucking button on their sabbath.

[2] Inevitable, to moiself.  Do the math: Israel is surrounded/outnumbered by their enemies, and seem determined to keep enemies as enemies instead of working toward peacefully co-existing with their neighbors and finding a humane solution to – or even acknowledging – the mistreatment and displacement of Palestinians.

[3] Along with that passive-aggressive classic, “Mistakes were made.”

[4] possibly starting for himself alone, but also couples counseling.

[5] As per his Wikipedia bio.

[6] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The End-Of-Year Lists I’m Not Compiling

Comments Off on The End-Of-Year Lists I’m Not Compiling

  • Best Movie;
    * Best Non-Sequel/Non-Superhero Movie;
    * Top Twenty-Five Insipid Christmas-Themed Streaming Series;
    * Best Spotify playlist;
    * Best Nonfiction Book;
    * Best Book Beloved By Critics Until Its Author Was Accused Of Cultural Appropriation;
    * Top Ten Food Delivery Services;
    * Best Science Podcast;
    * Least Annoying Comedy Podcast Which In Fact Is Just A Gabfest
    Hosted By A Likeable Celebrity Name-Dropping With His Fellow Celebrity Friends;

    * Best Hostage Exchange;
    * Best Cancel Culture ® Moment;
    * Most Predictable Hate Speech By MAGA-Courting GOP Politicians:
    * Best Surreptitious Recording of Racist City Council Members Eating Their Own
    Smoothest City Officials Kicking-The-Can-Down-The-Road Regarding
    Getting The Mentally Ill/Homeless Off The Streets….

Oh look, it’s a blank list.

 

Arts & Literature, Science and Technology, Politics and Armageddon culture….  So many categories to rank and rate. But, like moiself  titled this post, nope – not gonna do that.  Instead, I’ll offer one of my favorites, from the categorizy I’m not devising, that of  Best Visual Images From The Space We Hopefully Won’t Fuck Up Like We’ve Done To Our Own Planet  (image courtesy of The Planetary Society).

 

Image from Lightsail 2 of Tropical Storm Mirinae, near Japan.

 

“The Planetary Society’s LightSail program demonstrated that solar sailing is a viable means of propulsion for small satellites.

Solar sails use sunlight instead of rocket fuel for propulsion. They are one of the few technologies that could be used for interstellar travel

LightSail® is a crowdfunded project from The Planetary Society to demonstrate that solar sailing is a viable means of propulsion for CubeSats — small, standardized spacecraft that are part of a global effort to lower the cost of space exploration. Our LightSail 2 spacecraft, which launched on June 25, 2019 and reentered Earth’s atmosphere on Nov. 17, 2022, used sunlight alone to change its orbit.”

 Excerpts from “LightSail, a Planetary Society solar sail spacecraft,”
( The Planetary Society website )

*   *   *

Department Of The Partridge Of The Week

It’s (still!) that time of the year again. As has become a tradition much maligned anticipated in our neighborhood, moiself  is hosting a different Partridge, every week, in my front yard.   [1]

Can you identify this week’s guest Partridge?

 

*   *   *

Department Of Okay So I Lied

Here is one category moiself  will dare to rank:  Best Nonfiction Book Excerpt.

It’s from one of my favorite reads of the year, zoologist Lucy Cooke’s Bitch: On The Female Of The Species.  Context: from the chapter on social animals, the passage cited comes from a segment focusing on a species of termites that have both a king and queen. These termites practice an extreme brand of cooperative breeding:

“…involving a division of labor between breeders and infertile working castes, known as eusociality, from the Greek eu – meaning ‘good.’ Although this is another highly subjective term, since in truth, it is only really ‘good’ for one individual: Her Royal Reproductiveness. The rest of the several million termites in the colony, other than the king, are rendered sterile and kept in their lowly castes by ingesting pheromones secreted by the royal anus, all of which makes the British monarchy suddenly seem quite reasonable.”

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Confessions

If moiself  were compiling my own lists, of say, Songs/Albums Which Got The Most Ear-Time For Moiself, The Highwomen would be near the top.  It’s not a new release; the eponymous first (and so far only) album of the “supergroup” composed of American folk/country singers/songwriters/musicians  Brandi CarlileNatalie HembyMaren Morris, and Amanda Shires was released at the end of 2019.  There’s not one throwaway song on the album’s 12 tracks; each time I listen I think, “Oh, that’s my favorite…” until the next track plays.

Here’s the confession: cynical smartass moiself  can be a sloppy sentimentalist.

 

 

Yes; really.

I cannot listen to a certain song from that album without engaging in ugly bitch-baby-bawling.  Which is fitting in a way, as the song is so intimate and…tender.

In My Only Child,  the singer is both wondering about and trying to explain – to her “only child” daughter as well as to herself – the complicated amalgam of joy and regret that comes from having or being the only child.  The Highwomen bandmate Natalie Hemby, My Only Childs lead vocalist and co-writer, has said that the song was inspired in part by her own experiences, after her “only child” daughter began asking her parents for a baby brother or sister.

 

 

To have a single or “only” child, whether by intention or circumstance, is not my life, although it easily could have been.  I have two children,   [2]  yet when I listen to that song I think of both of them: what if either of them had been the “only” one?  I think of people I know who have or are only children, who’ve pondered what it would have been like to have and be a sibling…who’ve sometimes rued – or just accepted as a benign fact of life – that they will never fully understand the experience of being able to, for example, commiserate with a brother or sister over their aging parents’ care, or have someone who is not your parent but who has known you for your entire life.

The song’s combination of lyrics and the aching, lead vocal whose whisper-light gentleness belies the gravity of the longing…the haunting emotional lyricism of the mother affirming a decision and also allowing for the regrets of what-ifs –  it made me shake, the first time I heard it.  And it still makes me cry – softly now, but still, every damn time I listen to it, as though I am hearing the song for the first time.   [3]

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Faux New Year’s Resolutions:
The Words We Need To Stop Misusing…

Or using at all.

As per the Unexplainable podcast, “Basic Instinct.“ (12-7-22).

We all grew up seeing the nature documentaries (or perhaps even took classes from professors) that used the term “instinct“- or its cousin harase, “it’s genetic” – to explain how a spider knows to spin her web, or a cheetah knows what gazelles to hunt, or other multifaceted animal behaviors.  Turns out, it is So. Much. More. Complicated. ®  than “instinct.”  Recent studies in ethology  [4]  show that all animals, even the eusocial ones with so-called “hive minds,” are also individuals who learn and adapt, make errors, etc.

Let moiself  entice you (lure you into my web?)  with these excerpts.

 

 

Noam Hassenfeld, Unexplainable  podcast host:
It turns out the idea of instinct is a lot less simple than those nature documentaries can make it seem. I talked to a scientist who can’t stand this word (“instinct”).

Mark Blumberg (Unexplainable guest, a neuroscientist):
It’s basically a covert expression of ignorance and lack of imagination. That’s it….
I can’t tell you the number of articles, you know, for scientific journals that I review where people just throw the word around. It drives me crazy…. as soon as you say it’s genetic it means you can just skip over all the things that actually get you from that amorphous blob of an embryo or a newborn and get right to the action….
Every animal develops. It doesn’t matter who you are. All of us. We all develop.

NH:
So, Mark, where does this idea of animal instinct and innate animal behavior come from? How far back does it go?

Blumberg:
It goes back a long, long way….one of the interesting aspects of it is that it actually has its roots in a sort of a religious perspective….it starts as a problem with free will and reason and good and evil….
Imagine that…(as per developing Christian theology)…in order to earn your way to heaven and hell, you have to basically make choices. You have to have free will. You can’t take an animal that cannot make choices about good and evil and put them in heaven or hell. That doesn’t make sense. Humans are the only ones, we have a soul, we have free will, we have rationality.
These are all ideas within the religious context, but we’re not letting dogs into heaven or hell. So what you have to do is you have to deny them free will, but you have to explain what they’re doing. And you say, “Well, it’s instinctive.”

 

“No, honey, it’s not that I’m a shoddy dam builder – it’s my own instinct, to build it this way.”

 

The podcast host and his scientist guest go on to discuss many examples which show that behaviors we might normally think of as innate animal instincts are actually developed through experience.  Some scientists use the term instinct, or genetic for phenomena that are too complex to be currently understood or which no one is (currently)  interested in studying.  The wording creationists and other religious folk use to describe phenomena they cannot or will not understand in any other way is, “God did it/God made it.”  Many scientists, including Blumberg, accuse other scientists of essentially using a more sciency-sounding version of this religious “way out,” when it comes to studying and explaining complex animal behaviors (religion’s “God did it.” =  science’s “It’s instinctive.”). 

NH:
So this idea that, you know, animal behavior is hard-coded, is that still an argument that lots of scientists are making?

Blumberg:
Yeah, it’s everywhere. They use the word like, “I’m studying an innate behavior.” And they’re doing it in part because they think that by calling it innate, they’re making their work sound more important…more universal. “ I’m not just studying behavior X, I’m studying *innate* behavior X. Therefore, anything I learn about it must be super important, must have been evolved….”
So it’s partly a strategy and partly it’s ignorance about what the words actually mean.

NH:
That feels like you’re calling it laziness.

Blumberg:
I am absolutely calling it laziness….

NH:
Is that why you would say that this debate is important? I mean, it seems like on the surface someone could see it as a semantic debate.

Blumberg:
Because it…influences the way science is done (and) which scientists get the resources to do their work. It elevates scientists who are not so great, and it makes it harder for scientists doing the hard work to get the notoriety and the attention they deserve.
I see this in conferences all the time, you know, where very prominent people simply throw out the innate word or the instinct word and they get away with it because they aren’t being challenged. And that offends me as a scientist….
You just have to continue to be inquisitive and not search for simple answers to complex problems. You know, this is biology. Nothing is more complex than how animals come to do the things that they do, whatever the cause. And we should be trying to understand the diversity of life and all the different mechanisms that are available.

NH:
And we probably still don’t understand it all that well.

Blumberg:
No, we’re scratching the surface big time.

The full transcript is here.  22.12.07 Basic Instinct . Better still, listen to the interview.

 

Ahem – no, not *that* Basic Instinct

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [5]

“Man is a Religious Animal. He is the only Religious Animal.
He is the only animal that has the True Religion — several of them.

He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat if his theology isn’t straight.”     [6]

( Mark Twain)

 

 

*   *   *

May you have a Happy year’s end, whether full of lists or list-free;
May you be careful what you attribute to (read: blame on) instinct;
May you find a song which is worth weeping to;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

 

[1] Specifically, in our pear tree.

[2] And, unlike the song, my nursery walls were not painted pink, for either of my babes.

[3] Sometimes I skip that track when I’m listening to the album, if I decide I just can’t handle red puffy cryin’ eyes right now.

[4] Def. The study of animal behavior in its natural context.

[5] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists. No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

[6] Can’t close out the year without less than six footnotes.

Older Entries