Home

The Weekend Vacation Pictures I’m Not Showing You

Comments Off on The Weekend Vacation Pictures I’m Not Showing You

Department Of Headache-Free Travelogue   [1]

Moiself  and MH took off last Friday to spend the weekend with daughter Belle.  After starting the day with an appointment with our lawyer (to update our wills – a task which was much overdue and was in no way related to our calculating our odds of survival in making the trip) we drove north to Auburn, WA.  Auburn is the headquarters of Schilling Cider, where Belle works as QA manager, and also home to Belle, whom I recently insufferably boasted wrote about ( here ), re her passing her Pommolier exam.

We met Belle at her workplace in the late afternoon, got a brief “update” tour (we’d been there a couple of years ago) and had dinner with her at a local Thai restaurant.  After an acceptable hotel sleep   [2]   we picked her up the next morning at her apartment, drove south & west to Tacoma ( where both Belle and her brother, K, went to college,   [3]  and where Belle lived up until a year ago) for breakfast at one of Belle’s favorite diners, the  HobNob.  On our way there we discovered that Belle didn’t know what it meant to hobnob; she thought the term was a noun,    [4]   rather than a verb.  I told her she should pretend that MH and I had a certain amount of celebrity (or at least notoriety) so that she could say she had hobnobbed over breakfast.

Suggestion for Good Clean Fun ®:  try saying hobnob over and over and over. Or,  elbow, or  farm – in just a few moments you’ll sound like you’re making up nonsense, instead of repeating actual works that have actual meanings….

 

 

Once again, I digress.

After breakfast we drove across the Tacoma Narrows Bridge.  The TNB’s claim to fame is its predecessor, the original TNB bridge, nicknamed Galloping GertieGG’s collapse a mere four months after it opened (July 1940; likely due to an  aeroelastic flutter during a windstorm) was caught on film, and became  de rigueur viewing in West Coast high school physics classes for decades afterward. 

 

 

After a gallop-free bridge crossing, we headed up the east side of the Olympic Peninsula to Finnriver Cidery, where we had lunch and then a private tour   [5]  of their orchards and facilities.  Since the tour guide and Belle are both in the hard cider industry, I got to hear them exchanging a lot of shop talk (perhaps even a few trade secrets?).   It was a beautiful drive; Finnriver was an impressive place (Belle had been saying for two years that she “had to” take us there one day); the tour of the orchards and facilities was interesting, informative, and also tasty – during the tour we got to sample taste several different varieties of their ciders.

 

 

 

 

Afterwards we drove east to Port Townsend, the “…historic seaport with an artistic soul” on the northeastern tip of the Olympic Peninsula.  We stayed in a downtown hotel, walked around the downtown waterfront area, had dinner at Tommyknocker’s, a restaurant specializing in worldwide variations on Cornish pasties and other British Isles dishes (I was the only one who ordered a pasty – a vegan/Indian spiced variety).  After dinner we returned to the hotel to play games from the hotel’s collection in their library.  MH and Belle played a new version of Sorry; I joined them for Scrabble on the condition that, as MH put it, “You can’t win.”  [6]  After breakfast on Sunday we made a leisurely trip back down the peninsula, returned Belle to Auburn, and returned ourselves back down to Oregon.

Sorry (not really) if I bored the crap outta y’all, but this is so much more relaxing than the It’s-even-worse-than-I-thought ®   political primal scream commentary moiself  had originally planned for this space.

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Yeah, What He Said Quote Of The Week

 

 

*   *   *

Department of Quoting The Who,

“Meet the new boss/same as the old boss”
( The Who, Won’t Get Fooled Again )

So, yeah, a pope died this week. Which means there will be a new one, soon.

Some of my religious friends   [7] – those on the more liberal side re Christian theology – have said nice things about Pope Francis over the years.  Moiself  has seen no reason to not remain been skeptical.  Sure, I wanted someone with that kind of (regrettable) power over the ignorant ovine masses faithful to be more broad-minded than his predecessors; but as I’ve said before, PF’s kindler, gentler façade is just that:  a façade.  It’s a new window dressing on a cracked, skewed window.  The House (of Roman Catholicism) got new drapes, while it’s 2000-year-old window frames, door jambs, and its very foundation continues to erode.

Given his (or any pope’s) influence, PF’s proclamations could have inspired his flock to action that would have benefited people all over the globe. But the only reason he had that “authority” (religious, cultural political, whatever) is because people gave it to him. 

“I have as much authority as the Pope.
I just don’t have as many people who believe it.”

( Comedian, author, social critic George Carlin, from his book, Brain Droppings  )

People continue to pay attention to proclamations from the Vatican (or other religious institutions and leaders) as it they were relevant to our century.  Coming from pre-scientific, superstition-bound folk, that is understandable.  From present-day, religion-free progressives and their liberal religious brethren, this is mind-boggling:  y’all be reinforcing the influence of the elderly inhabitants of the Vatican – an institution that was historically and is currently hostile toward rational thought, intellectual freedom, and human rights (no matter how many “nice” things they may say re classes of people they formerly abused and still [if tacitly] denigrate).

 

 

The more I think on it the more irritating I find the progressives’ and liberals’ praises re PF.  I mean, what did Franky-boy say that hasn’t been said – and better and sooner – by others?  PF began his pope gig by playing nice, by saying kind things…uh yeah, a decent human being is supposed to be like that.  Why were progressives fawning over a religious leader, and not for being factually correct, but for being nice?  

PF said a few “nice” things ( “nice” if contrasted with, kill them infidels and pervies ) things about gays, and made an acknowledgement of the existence of global warming, and liberals suddenly pretended *not* to remember the RC church’s 2000-year history of getting everything wrong, and then ignoring/refusing to right the wrongs in the face of the evidence.    [8]

Franky-boy said that “women in the church are more important than bishops and priests”…right after saying “…on woman as priests, that cannot be done.”  Thanks for throwing us that cheap/holy bone, Your Inadequacy-ness.    For *twelve* years PF was the leader of the his faith’s hierarchy, that “clutch of hysterical sinister virgins”    [9]  who assert their divine mandate to dictate sexual standards and reproductive health care proscriptions to and for women, while banning women from that same hierarchy.   And he did not use his pope power to change that.

 

Ordain women or stop baptizing them.

 

I’m tired of blathering about it all these years; I’ll let others more articulate and accomplished than moiself  blather their share.

Andrew L. Seidel, Staff Attorney for the Freedom From Religion Foundation had these observations after the pope’s brief visit to three major US cities in 2015:

“The pope’s whirlwind visit was a public relations coup for the Vatican. But scratch the surface of the PR machine and we find that the pope is all talk….

The pope speaks a great deal about healing the wounds of child abuse–child rape and torture is the more appropriate phrase–even saying “God weeps.” God might weep (if he existed), but they must be crocodile tears, because the pope speaks, but does not act. The pope has the power to stop the rape and torture of children. The solution is simple: Turn over priests accused of this to the criminal and civil justice system and stop hiding and shuffling them around the globe. Turn the rapists and their protectors over to the police and use the vast wealth of the Vatican to make some amends to the victims….He has this power and budget, but does not use it.

He denies women control of their bodies and lives, and upholds the Catholic ban on contraception, even though condom-use would save millions of African lives. He cares more for the rules of his god – supposedly all-powerful though easily defeated by a thin strip of latex – than human life. He’s the pope, he could change the church’s stance, but won’t.

He opposes equal rights for LGBTQ people. He may “not judge” them, but he has the power to change billions of minds and help LGBTQ rights…. But he won’t….

When someone has the power to change a moral evil but does not, their words and excuses are irrelevant. Actions, as the saying goes, speak louder than words. Frank talks a good game, but he’s not doing anything. Talk is cheap….”

(  Excerpts, Reminder: The pope’s still conservative and a moral hypocrite,”
September 30, 2015 by Andrew Seidel )

 

 

“Anita Bryant did more for gay rights than this co-opting, faux-queer-friendly fraud ever did. At least Anita made us angry and inspired rebellion and fury against her stupid homophobia…. But this new guy does nothing and pretends to be gay positive.  Remember that song Smiling Faces Sometimes by the Temptations, with the lyrics ‘Beware of the pat on the back. It just might hold you back’?  This is Francis. ‘Good queer,’ he seems to imply when he utters ‘Who am I to judge?’ about gay marriage. Who *are* you?! You’re the fucking Pope for Christ’s sake, that’s who you are.

( quote from Mr. Know-It-All: The Tarnished Wisdom of a Filth Elder,
by John Waters )

 

Ordain women and LGBTQ folk or stop dressing like drag queens.

 

*   *   *

Department Of Heaven On Earth

Those of us who are Atheist/Skeptics/Humanists/Freethinkers/Brights generally hold no belief in an afterlife; we know that humans find and make our paradises (or netherworlds) right where we are, in the here and now.  And according to a study I just made up, whether y’all are religion-free or superstition/supernatural-bound a POOF  (“person of observant faith”)    [10]   there is nothing more satisfying for epicureans/foodies/gourmands than reading through a new cookbook.

Moiself  can’t think of any place else I’d rather be than right here, right now, flipping through the pages of a new   [11]   cookbook.  Dora Ramirez’s Comida Casera is home cooking (literal translation), Mexican plant-based style. And from what I’ve seen so far, Ramirez has a lot of sabroso (tasty) style.

As is my custom with a new cookbook, I read through it and mark on a piece of paper (which I keep with the cookbook) what recipes moiself  be interested in trying.  So far, I’d be marking just about every page.   ¿Como se dice YEE  HAW en Español?

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [12]

 

 

*   *   *

May you hobnob with the best of them;
May you savor the joy of reading a new cookbook;
May you stop praising dead popes and paying attention to live ones;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] As in, writing about family travels give me less of a headache than writing about the state of our democracy.

[2] Moiself  generally does not sleep well in hotels…if I get 4-5 hours’ worth, it’s a win.

[3] At the University of Puget Sound.

[4] Like…a nob that had…hobs on it?

[5] Only in that the three of us were the only three in the 1pm tour group – later tours had more people.

[6] I did win…but not intentionally, and just by eight or so points.

[7] Yes, I do have them.

[8] It took them until nineteen hundred and fucking ninety-two to apologize to Galileo.

[9] My favorite terminology for the RC’s (alleged) celebate male heierarch – from the pope and cardinals down to the parish priests – comes from (surprise!) the ever quotable, late great Christopher Hitchens.

[10] Which is an acronym I think the world sorely needs.

[11] Both to me, and to the world – it was published just this year.

[12] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The End-Stage Capitalism I’m Not Practicing

Comments Off on The End-Stage Capitalism I’m Not Practicing

Department Of They Nailed It, Again (damn!)

Once again, a well-researched, well-written, well-postulated, intriguing, provocative article from The Atlantic … And, once again, because said article observes the truth about our society, it is also well-effin’ depressin’ in some ways.

“The internet’s biggest by-product is loneliness; porn isn’t special in that regard. You and I weren’t made to live this way; we barely are living this way. Many of the traits that make us human—our compassion, our ability to devote sustained thought to a problem, our capacity to fall in love and to sacrifice for the people we love—are meaningless to the algorithms that rule us. They’ve deformed us.
Every time I hear a middle-class young woman make the utilitarian argument for why she makes sexual videos on OnlyFans—because she can make in two hours of work what would take her 40 hours to earn waitressing—I think, Here it is at last: end-stage capitalism. The phase in which nothing has any value or meaning other than its sale price.”

 ( Excerpt, “Sex Without Women – What happens when men prefer porn?”
The Atlantic
, by Caitlin Flanagan )

 

 

*   *   *

*   *   *

Department Of Things That Never Get Old   [1]

Welcome to yet another new feature of the new year, which may continue on the third Friday of each month.  Or…not.

 

 

*   *   *

Department of Holy …

Cow?   Mackerel?  Matrimony?  Shit?
Holy Uncanny Photographic Mental Processes, Batman!   [2]    

 

 

Ahem – make that, Holy Week, ®  which, in the Christian tradition (or most of them  [3]  )
is this week.

“During Holy Week, Christians recall the events leading up to Jesus’ death by crucifixion and, according to their faith, his Resurrection.
The week includes five days of special significance. The first is Palm Sunday, which commemorates Jesus’ humble entry (on a donkey) into Jerusalem to observe Passover….Maundy Thursday marks Jesus’ institution at the Last Supper of the Eucharist, thereafter a central element of Christian worship  [4]  …. Good Friday commemorates Jesus’ suffering and death on the cross….Holy Saturday, also called Easter Vigil, is the traditional end of Lent….Easter Sunday is the celebration of Jesus’ Resurrection, according to the Gospels, on the third day after his crucifixion….”

( excerpts; Brittannica: What is Holy Week? )

 

 

“The Easter celebration is a bit of a strange holiday. Is it about bunnies and eggs? Is it Pagan, or Christian, or Jewish? Why does the date move?…

What is Easter?

Easter is a Christian holiday celebrating the day Christians believe that Jesus returned from the dead after being killed.

So why does the date of Easter move?
And where did the eggs and bunnies come from?

In early Christianity, the Christian church moved the celebration of Easter to coincide with an existing pagan festival on the first full moon after the spring equinox, which is why Easter moves every year. In old pagan customs, eggs were a symbol of new life, and rabbits a symbol of fertility. These ‘Easter eggs’ became ways for Christians to talk about the “resurrection” (when Jesus Christ came back to life) they celebrated.”

( excerpts, “What is Easter:  A Timeline of Holy Week,” Westminster Chapel )

We (MH and moiself ) are heading up to visit daughter Belle for the weekend.  Weeks ago, when moiself  began looking at lodging and restaurants for the trip, I wondered why venues seemed to be so crowded or unavailable…oh yeah, it’s a holiday weekend.  MH and I had to be reminded that this week, for many, is Holy Week.   We’ve often remarked to each other that it’s funny how, once you’re out of religion and your kids are out of their school cycles, the breaks/holidays at this time of year (Spring Break;  Easter, which sometimes coincide but not this year) just aren’t on your radar.

So, Happy Holy Week to those of you who observe it.  [5]   Just please remember   [6]  where your observances come from  (  moiself’s  primer follows; you’re welcome ) before y’all go around proclaiming holy this and holy that.

 

 

As with almost all “Christian” holidays, Easter was originally a festival of another religion, and derives from a variety of pagan celebrations When early Christian missionaries encountered the Northern European tribes they attempted to convert them to Christianity and, of course, alter the peoples’ existing religious observations.  They did so somewhat stealthily, as suggested by church authorities and finally “officialized” in 601 A.D., when Pope Gregory I issued an edict to his missionaries regarding the customs of peoples they wanted to convert. Rather than ban outright the native customs and beliefs, the pope had his missionaries incorporate them (e.g., if people worshipped a tree at Yule time, rather than cut it down, Greg I advised missionaries to consecrate the tree to Christ – thus, the Christmas tree).

Still, every Easter, many Christian parents are put in the uncomfortable position of having to explain to the kiddies why the torture, execution, and supposed resurrection of Jesus is celebrated with colored eggs and cute widdle-bitty bunnies – uncomfortable, in that most adult Christians have only a vague clue about the connection.  [7]

The name of the holiday, Easter, is the name of a pagan goddess, and was identified as the source of the holiday’s name by a Christian theologian, “The Venerable Bede” (672-735 CE, in his book De Ratione Temporum).  The name Easter  has many variations (Ostare, Ostara, Ostern, Eostra, Eostre, Ester, Eastra, Eastur, Astarte, etc.) but all of these come from the same Roman deity, the goddess of the dawn, named “Eos” or “Easter.”

The Saxons also celebrated the return of spring with a festival commemorating their goddess of offspring, fertility and springtime renewal, Eastre, and other ancient peoples had similar celebrations.  The Scandinavian deity was “Ostra” and the Teutonic “Ostern” — both goddesses signifying spring and fertility, and their festivals were celebrated on the vernal equinox.  Christian apologists often insist that the name of the goddess Easter is just a coincidence, and that the name actually came from the Germanic word “ostern.”  Cool story, bros, but this doesn’t explain all those bunnies and eggs.

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [8]

Special Easter Edition

 

 

 

*   *   *

May you strive to see the value or meaning of everything other than its sale price;
May you appreciate the origins of rites and rituals and their variants;
May you celebrate Spring, no matter what you call it;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

 

[1] At least, to ever-youthful moiself.

[2] Robin’s 20 Weirdest ‘Holy Batman’ Lines From the TV Show

[3] Easter is celebrated on two different dates depending on which church you belong to.  The Great Schism of 1054 caused “The Church” to be divided into the Catholic and Orthodox Church.  Later, the Catholics switched from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar, while the Orthodox Church followed the original calendar system of the Julian calendar.

[4] Which most Christian churches refer to as Communion; which most non-Christian religions view as a bizarre, ritualistic quasi-cannibalism.

[5] And if you do celebrate Holy Week, what the holy hell are you doing reading THIS blog?

[6] Or learn, for the first time, if you’re like the majority of Christians who have no little idea of the histories of their holidays.

[7] Some remember that Easter is somehow linked to the Jewish Passover celebration.  However, seeing as how Yahweh didn’t send a plague of egg-hiding rabbits into Egypt, the link seems rather…tenuous.

[8] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Hippie Trail I’m Not Taking

Comments Off on The Hippie Trail I’m Not Taking

Department Of Something You Might Never Guess About Me…

 

Booooorrrrring

 

Yeah; well, there’s that.  But on the unlikely assumption that you might want to guess, moiself  will share the following.

If I were to rank various Household Upkeep Tasks ® as to their relative difficulty and/or boredom/frustration/loathing-inducing quotient, here is the task that, although it would be near the bottom of the scale in terms of difficulty, would top the scale for  I-really-hate-doing-this:

Changing the pillowcases.

 

 

Yes, really.  As in, stripping the pillowcases off the pillows, then putting them back on the pillows after they’ve been laundered.

It’s been this way for as long as I can remember…I think.  But I can only remember this  loathing-for-pillowcase-wrangling arising in my later young adulthood, as in, married life and through the present moment.   [1]   Was I like this when I was a child, living with my parents and helping with chores, or in college and afterward, doing laundry on my own?   Where is the self-help book for this kind of personal neuroses analysis, especially since there are so many more involved and or icky tasks when it comes to home upkeep?   [2]

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of How I Didn’t Spend My Summer Vacation Sabbatical…

…but it warms the cockles of my heart to know that there are smarter, more visionary, and “better” people than moiself  who are working on ways to save us from ourselves.

Most people take sabbaticals as an extended form of vacation, or to fine tune career and/or personal goals.  Too often the career goal seems to be, How To Spend Less Time Making More Money.  Imagine what the world might be like if more Brilliant Minds ® used their time as productively as did the founder of Impossible Foods.

 

 

 

 

Sixteen years Stanford biochemist Pat Brown took an 18-month sabbatical, during which he considered how he wanted to spend the rest of his professional life.  Brown’s research showed him that the world’s leading environmental problem wherein he felt he could have an impact was animal agriculture – the use of animals to produce food.

Writer Jasmine Singer    [3]   interviewed Brown for the current issue of  VegNews, re why he left his “dream job” in academia to tackle the problems of global warming and environmental degradation through food production innovation.  Here are some excerpts from that article, a read that moiself  and my Roving Rodent Reviewer highly recommend y’all check out in its entirety.

 

 

PB:
“…I started educating myself about global environmental issues and realized the two greatest threats to humanity are climate change and the collapse of ecosystems and biodiversity—both caused by our use of animals. Animal agriculture takes up 45 percent of Earth’s ice-free surface, displacing healthy, biodiverse ecosystems. In the oceans, it’s overfishing. Phasing out animal agriculture could actually unlock negative emissions that would have the power to offset more than two-thirds of projected CO2 emissions this century. Once I realized that, I felt I had to do something.

JS:
Could you elaborate on how replacing animals in food systems
addresses this crisis?

PB:
Biodiversity loss is overwhelmingly driven by the land use of animal agriculture. That land that was once used to support diverse ecosystems is now used as grazing land or to grow feed crops. We’re seeing catastrophic consequences—populations of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, and fish have dropped to less than a third of what they were 50 years ago. Phasing out animal agriculture can reverse these losses by restoring ecosystems. This isn’t just about food; it’s about the survival of humanity.

JS:
Why focus on replacing animal-based food rather than advocating for dietary changes or legislation?

PB:
You’re not going to solve the problem by persuading people to change their diets or legislating what they eat.

The issue isn’t that people love meat; it’s the destructive technology
we use to produce it….We need to offer better technology for producing delicious, satisfying food.

The challenge wasn’t matching the nutritional value of animal products—that’s easy. It was about replicating their sensory experience: taste, texture, aroma.
By applying biochemistry, we realized we could create plant-based foods that not only matched but outperformed animal products in deliciousness and environmental impact….” 
    [4]

 

 

PB:
“…Eliminating the demand for animal agriculture is essential, but it’s only part of the solution. The opportunity created by freeing up 45 percent of Earth’s land is massive. Restoring healthy ecosystems on that land can halt biodiversity collapse and capture the 800 gigatons of carbon released by clearing it in the first place.
Unlike fossil fuel emissions, these land-use emissions are reversible—plants can pull the CO2 back.

 (  Excerpts, my emphases, “Impossible Foods’ Visionary Founder
on the Fight to Save the Planet…Pat Brown is using science to take on animal agriculture—and its devastating impact on the planet….
VegNews, Spring 2025 )

 

 

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Thoughts For The Day (Or A Lifetime)

Moiself  has never before considered the supposition that one’s happiness might depend on living in a place that (or being the kind of person who)  has nothing that other people want; thus, you are left in peace.

This idea comes from one passage in the book I recently finished reading,  about the travels taken by Rick Steves and a friend in 1978.  Now a renowned travel writer, Steves was at the time an enthusiastic if somewhat “square” college grad in his early twenties, who undertook the  celebrated “Hippie Trail” backpacking trip from Istanbul to Kathmandu. He kept a journal while on the trip, and all these years later, published his edited journal entries and the photographs he took during the trip, which document his life-changing journey through Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, and Nepal.

This passage was from the last chapter of the book: where Rick and his travel companion have finally entered Nepal, and are journeying on a rickety old bus.  Rick notices that, for the first time on the trip, there are no other Westerners in sight.  As Rick hangs his head out the window, taking in the sights of “…a vigorous river, long and lonely rope footbridges, thatched huts, and green, dipping terraces…”  he marvels at the sincerity and friendliness and serenity of every Nepali they’ve encountered, despite (or because of?) Nepal being the most impoverished country they’ve visited, in terms of Western metrics (e.g. average household wage, technology access).

“The kilometers passed slowly. I thought of a book I enjoyed – Reflections on the Basic Causes of Human Misery – that made the case that some of Earth’s happiest people were happy because they lived on land poor in natural resources and difficult to live on… land that no other group of people wanted. Perhaps this is why the Nepali expression, when at rest, seems to be a gentle smile.”

(  excerpt, chapter Nepal; On the Hippie Trail: Istanbul to Kathmandu and the
Making of a Travel Writer,  by Rick Steves )

 

 

*   *   * 

Department Of A Blast From The Past

New Year; new project: taking an excerpt from a past blog, from the same time frame (the second Friday of whatever month).  Perhaps moiself  will like this enough that it will turn out to be a regular blog feature for 2025?  Time, and my capacity for reruns, will tell.

This journey down memory lane is related to the most convincing reason a  YOU-of-all-people-should-write-a-blog-why-aren’t-you-writing-a-blog?!?!?!  [5]   friend gave me, all those years ago,   [6]   as to why I should be writing a blog: a blog would serve as a journal of sorts for my life.  Journal/diary-resistant moiself  would have some sort of a record, or at least a random sampling, of what was on my mind – and possibly what was on the nation’s mind – during a certain period of time.

Now I can, for example, look back to the second Friday of a years-ago April, to see what I was thinking. (or as MH put it, WHAT was I thinking!?!? )

 

 

Here is an excerpt from my blog of 4-10-15   [7] ( The Bird I’m Not Calling ).

 Those Who Live In Glass Houses Shouldn’t Cast the First Stone
After Walking A Mile In Someone Else’s Shoes

As much fun as I’m having with the latest batch of the Scientology exposés (including documentaries and books from journalists and former Scientologists alike), it’s just as much fun hearing criticism of Scientology coming from other religious believers.

 

 

In this country, most religious believers who diss Scientology self-identify as Christians. Christians, as in, people who go to a temple or church or some other kind of worship box to grovel to/”invite into their hearts” the ghost    [8]  of a 2000 year old Jewish zombie who, according to their holy book and their 2K+ year old theologies, was his own father (and who, therefore, impregnated his own virgin mother). This father-deity ordered mass murders of Egyptian babies and men women and children of other religions, sent a bear to maul children the for the crime of teasing a man about his male pattern baldness, hates foreskins for some reason but loves the smell of sacrificed animals, and, as per that book again, says that says disease comes from sinning and that a complicated ritual involving killing birds and wiping their blood on human body parts will cure leprosy…and then to worship this god you symbolically eat him (via crackers and juice or wine, which turn into the Jewish zombie’s skin and blood in your tummy  [9]  ) and telepathically tell him you accept him as your master, so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in all humans because 6,000 years ago a rib-derived woman was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical but forbidden tree….

Yeah, that’s the ticket.  Cool story, bro.

Anyone who swallows that shit believes all or even some of that has little business criticizing Xenu, engrams, thetansauditing, and the whole lot of wackadoodle Scientology tenets.

Oh, but the fun continues. Many religious believers cap their anti-Scientology statements with, Besides, it (Scientology) isn’t even a real religion!”

Excuse-moiself?

Scientology teaches crazy shit and asks you for money – of course it’s a real religion.

 

 

*   *   *

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [10]

 

 

*   *   *

May you wean yourself from the products of animal agriculture;
May you make peace with your most loathes household task;
May you leave other lands in peace even if they have resources you want;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] And it’s not because I am unequally burdened by this task – ours is an Equal Opportunity Bed Linen Stripping Home ®  : both MH and I do the sheets, and each does their own pillowcases.

[2] Some but not all of which involve toilets and cat barf.

[3] Her website boasts more descriptors than you’ll ever shake a carrot stick at:  “Author.  Editor.  Speaker.  Actor.  Activist.  Lesbian.  Vegan.”

[4] And they did it, via the discovery of heme: “Heme was a critical discovery because it’s one of nature’s best catalysts. It drives the chemical reactions that create the explosion of flavors and aromas when meat is cooked. Using heme and basic biomolecules like amino acids and fatty acids, we could reproduce the sensory experience of meat.”

[5] I was adamant about not writing a blog…thus, the title of the blog I eventually decided to write.

[6] Was it really over twelve years ago?

[7] TEN years ago !?!?!?!?!

[8] Aka “The Holy Spirit.”

[9] the Catholic teaching of transubstantiation. The understandings of the communion rite varies among the many flavors of Protestant and Orthodox Christianity, but the majority of sects still practice some form of the body-blood-of-Christ consuming ritual.

[10] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Strategy I’m Not Endorsing

Comments Off on The Strategy I’m Not Endorsing

Department Of So Long To Asparagus Every Damn Day Month

Every damn day.  Of March.  Yep.

I’m gonna miss it; moiself  loves fresh asparagus season.  It was fun, every damn day, either trying out new recipes or returning to long time favorites.   [1]

Asparagus Every Damn Day Month is not on the official National Day Calendar or those months long observances lists  [2]   …but it should be.  It will be on mine, starting this year, and continuing…as long as moiself  feels like it.

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Attention, All You One-Issue Warriors:
This Is What Your Purity Got You

Moiself,  remembers how frustrated, hopeless, and angered-bordering-on-enraged I felt when, before the election, I was talking to daughter Belle about why some Otherwise Fully Left-Leaning People ® her age openly spoke of their reluctance to vote for the Democrats in November.  She said the OFLLP were thinking of either voting for The National Socialist German Workers Party  the MAGA Nazis the Republican presidential ticket, or not voting at all, due to the Democrats’    [3]   knee-jerk support of Israel.

 

 

“So, for this one issue about which they feel strongly, they are willing to risk the shitstorm which *Every* Other Issue will undergo, if the Mandarin Mussollini and his jackbooted thugs attain power?” I sputtered.  “What do they think will happen if the Republicans get to The White House – do they think Palestinians and those who support their cause will get a better shake, or anything resembling fair treatment?”

Though I am also frustrated by the seemingly unnavigable and unwinnable (for any side) Israel-Palestine situation, I was quite twitterpated by this leftist electoral clusterfuck strategy – which I’d heard/read about from other sources as well – enough so that Belle had to assure me that *she* wasn’t going to do that.  She saw that strategy as ultimately self-defeating (not voting at all would be a passive vote *for* the Evil Empire Republicans), if understandable, on certain levels.

And now, here we are.

“The video is a grim watch. Plainclothes officers, some masked, confront a student in a Boston suburb, handcuff her and force her toward an unmarked car. From what we know now, the student — Rumeysa Ozturk, a 30-year-old Turkish national on a student visa working on her PhD at Tufts University — was taken by homeland security officials to a facility in faraway Louisiana. The video of her arrest Tuesday proliferated on social media.

By Thursday, U.S. officials confirmed that Ozturk’s student visa had been revoked and that she was in deportation proceedings — one of a growing number of foreign nationals here legally who have had their visas revoked by the Trump administration for allegedly participating in pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses. Secretary of State Marco Rubio criticized foreign students he said were ‘creating a ruckus’ in universities and said his agency had already revoked about 300 student visas. ‘We do it every day,’ Rubio told reporters Thursday. ‘Every time I find one of these lunatics, I take away their visas.’ ”
(excerpts, The Washington Post, “Trump’s war on universities puts U.S. in an
autocratic club – Rumeysa Ozturk’s arrest reflects a wider global trend of
nationalist leaders targeting universities as hotbeds of radicalism….” )

 

 

“We’re going to punish the Dems; they take our support for granted….”
( rhetoric from Palestinian supporters & other disaffected leftists )

To y’all  Of-course-I-didn’t-like-tR___-but-I-wanted-to-punish-the-Dem-establishment  voters and abstainers:

Y’all happy now?
Did you get what you wanted?

Of course it wasn’t what you *wanted.*  But it *was* what was FUCKING  INEVITABLE, to anyone paying half a brain’s worth of political attention.

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Speaking Of The Unspeakable

#47, who as regular readers of this space know will not be mentioned by his birth name in this space, is known for his nicknaming of his opponents, in spectacularly non-imaginative ways (e.g. such rhetorical zingers as, Crooked Hilary; Sleepy Joe).  The they-go-low-we-go-high optimistim policy of the Obamas, while morally and ethically admirable, was ultimately ineffective.  Thus, moiself  highly encourages one and all to take what little comfort can be gained in these times that try our hearts, by riding that low train on the low road, as far down as it will go.

If you need help in doing so, see ActionNetwork’s Pick a Nickname for D_____ tR___   here.
I think this was from a while back, but it’s still fun.  And petty/infantile?  Sure.  But, as the site curator wrote…

 “I think it’s time we came up with, and stuck with, a truly wicked nickname for Trump. One that all of us can use, akin to what Dan Savage did to Rick Santorum      [5]   oh so many years ago.
Now why do it? For the same reason Trump does it: It will drive him nuts. And the nuttier Trump gets, the more quickly he will show the American people just how unfit he is to serve as president. (And frankly, the man spends so much time taunting people, he deserves a little taunting back.)”

You can suggest entries of your own (moiself  likes The Mandarin Mussolini, which I first heard from Belle ), or vote for entries they list, which include such spot-on pithy descriptors as

* Traitor Trump
* Cheatin’ Donald
* Don the Con
* Cadet Bone Spur
* Agent Orange
* Benedict Donald
* Lil’ Donny Moscow
* Red Don
* FAUXTUS
* Mrs. Putin
* Impotus
* President Spanky McLiarface

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of A Sure-Fire Cure, However Temporary,
For Cynicism And Despair…

…doesn’t exist.  Yet.  But watching Love on the Spectrum comes close.   [6]

LOTS  is a reality television show, from a couple of years back (with a new/third season, available just as of a few days ago), with American and Australian versions.  It follows young (mostly) adults on the autism spectrum as they begin, with the help of family and friends and autism-knowledgeable life coaches, to dive into the dating world.

When moiself  recently started re-watching that series during my morning exercises, I remembered the spectrum (sorry) of emotions I experienced the first time I saw it, several years ago.  I didn’t know anything about the series when I first started watching it, then had a sheepish, Well what were you expecting?!  realization about halfway through the second episode, re what I was so surprised about?  I couldn’t (shouldn’t) have been surprised to see that, regardless of one’s neuro (typical or atypical) status, most of us share the same panoply of emotions and experience the same wonders and blunders of humanity, particularly when it comes to trying to understand attraction, dating, and love.

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [7]

 ( Excerpts From responses posted on ( an atheist-leaning) Reddit chat site, in response to the prompt:
“The Middle East is fighting over make believe again.
Do you ever think ‘fuck it, let them fight?’ ” )

* I will admit that this thought crossed my mind despite being a Jewish wife.
Then I saw the video of the grieving families….
I support both Israeli and Palestinian victims and stand against Hamas and the Israeli Defense Force and anyone else who kills civilians….
This brings me back to the murderous almighty.
“ Do you ever think ‘fuck it, let them fight?  Do you feel guilty for thinking this?
I felt guilty AF.

* The religions might be fake but the exploded loved ones are really real.
This fight will go on forever, until one side or the other is dead. It’s disgusting.
And it did not have to be this way.

* This fight will go on forever, until one side or the other is dead.

* It will not end after this. History has shown that they will just pick a new enemy to kill
over something equally meaningless.

 

*   *   *

May you never vote as a one-issue purity warrior;
May you appreciate the love in your life no matter your place on the spectrum;
May you enjoy the petty pleasure that is only possible
when savoring nicknames such as Lil’ Donny Moscow;

…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] When in doubt, steam or bake, dress with lemon juice, minced garlic, salt & pepper, a spritz of EVOO and/or a tablespoon of plant-based parmesan.

[2] There are some good ones there – I was aware of January’s Dry January and Veganuary, but had no idea that February is National Bird-Feeding Month (United States), April is Financial Literacy Month, and May is International Masturbation Month….

[3] the party in general and the Biden administration in particular.

[4] Why isn’t there another footnote here?

[5] In the early 2000’s Rick Santorum made many anti-LGBTQ statements in his campaign for the senate, including comparing gay marriage to man on dog sex.  In response, author, advice columnist and gay rights activist Dan Savage led a campaign to have the name “santorum” mean a crude sexual act, and enough people participated in the stunt that for many months, when you googled ITAL Santorum the first two hits you got were a description of some quite visually repulsive imagery….  Ah, the glory days.

[6] No footnote here; nope.  Move it along, folks.

[7] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.  No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org