Home

The Text Translations I’m Not Editing

Comments Off on The Text Translations I’m Not Editing

Department Of Moiself  Could Do Much Better.  So, I Did.

The 26 across clue for the New York Times Saturday crossword puzzle was “a bad look.”  Neither MH nor I thought it was a good match for the answer to 26 across, which turned out to be, “the eye.”

Say what?

According to a study I just made up, everybody knows that a bad look is not  the eye, it’s the evil eye, or the stink eye, et al.  We both agreed that the phrase the eye is rarely used, but when it is, it may be neutral as in, that person‘s giving you the eye, as in, they’re checking you out, perhaps in a curious or flattering way (because they find you interesting or attractive)…but it isn’t necessarily “bad.”

The Saturday NYT crosswords are the most difficult of the week, often incorporating obscure clues and/or answers.  Thus, I was proud of moiself  for coming up with what I thought would be the perfect Saturday (difficult/obscure) crossword clue, if you want the answer to be, the eye.

Clue:  “___ ___ of Laura Mars” (if she only had one).    [1]

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Siri (Or Whatever Is Listening) Doesn’t Like How I Enunciate

…a phenomenon for which I am mostly grateful, in that it often provides moiself  (and my fortunate/unfortunate textees) with cheap entertainment.

Category: Best Mistranslation Of The Year.    [2] 

Dateline:  Saturday, late morning.  Moiself  has been exchanging texts with friend LH, whom I invited to Sunday dinner and with whom I’ve been discussing menu possibilities:

What was spoken/dictated, by moiself:
“…you’re a yes for dinner?”

What was translated as a text:
“…your ass for dinner?”

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of  And The Oscar Goes To…

The afore-mentioned mistranslation blooper is, so far, runner up for  Best Mistranslated Text Ever.  First place goes to a text of mine from of years past.  Setting:  MH and I were on a crowded light rail train.  I received a text from friend JWW, asking if she could come over to our house to collect some plants MH had promised her, for her yard.  I dictated my answer, letting her know that we were not at home, and that I was texting from the Max train, as we were on our way to Portland.

What was spoken, by moiself:
“…we’re on our way to attend the Portland Folk Festival.”

What was translated:
“…we’re on our way to attend the Portland Fuck Festival.”

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of A Book To Distract From Politics

After reading Patrick Stewart’s recent memoir, Making It So, I’ve been thinking about moiself’s  favorite Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes, after Stewart named his.   [3]   As of this moment, they are, in dyslexic alphabetical order (with commentary by guest commentator, moiself )

* The Inner Light
(an entire life lived in 20 minutes – even sci fi legend Ursula Le Guin was impressed  [4] )

* Yesterday’s Enterprise
( introducing arguably    [5]  the bravest fictional captain ever: Rachel Garrett)

* The Best of Both Worlds, Parts 1 & 2
(featuring the creepiest, most unnerving of enemies, The Borg)

 

 

* The Face of the Enemy
( Kidnapped Troi walks a razor’s edge to help resistance fighters )

* The Offspring
( Data “loves” and loses a child of his own creation)

* The Host
(Dr. Crusher loves and loses a person of a symbiotic species)

* Reunion
(More love and loss: Klingon politics; Worf and his valiant ex-with-a-secret)

 

 

* I, Borg
(Geordi makes me hate the Borg a little bit less….[6]   )

* Lower Decks
(A welcome focus on junior officers; a noble sacrifice from one of them)

* Sarek
(The aging diplomat battles dementia with Picard’s mind-meld help )

* Unification Parts 1 & 2
(Has ST legend Spock gone rogue trying to help Romulan dissidents?)

* Data’s Day
( A Vulcan Ambassador/spy; Data learns to tap dance)

 

 

* Manhunt
(Lwaxana Troi chews scenery and saves a peace conference from terrorists)

* Starship Mine
(aka “Die Hard Picard,” but Data’s attempts at small talk steal the show)

* Ensign Ro
(The “difficult” Bajoran terrorist with a poignant backstory)

* Cost of Living
(Flamboyancy hiding her loneliness, Lwaxana Troi mentors Worf’s son)

 


Featuring one of Worf’s best lines, re the experience of taking a mud bath  [7]

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [8]

 

*   *   *

Parting Shot:  I love it when/I hate it when…

I love it when moiself  watches a show I’ve seen a bajillion times before, and at a particularly poignant moment, even though I know *exactly* what’s ahead, I still cannot stop myself from crying.

 

 

*   *   *

May you never serve…uh, you know what…for Sunday dinner;
May you send the NY Times crossword editor your own “better” clues;
May you enjoy a good cry from your own favorite poignant TV episode;

…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

 

*   *   *

[1] Taken from the title of the 1978 Faye Dunaway movie, The Eyes Of Laura Mars.

[2] Hey, the year ain’t over yet.

[3] No surprise to ST fans, it was The Inner Light.

[4] Le Guin praised the series, and that Hugo Award-winning episode in particular, in her 1994 essay for TV Guide.

[5]   As in, if you were to argue with me about it, which would be a waste of time but hey, it’s your life.

[6] But they still should have taken the opportunity to destroy/weaken the collective, IMO.

[7] “You’re just supposed to *sit* here?!”

[8] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Husband I’m Not Tempting

Comments Off on The Husband I’m Not Tempting

Department Of Belated Summer Wishes

Happy Summer Solstice to all!  And to my fellow yogis, if this tradition is in your practice, I hope you had a memorable 108 Sun Salutations.

 

*   *   *

Department Of Get Thee Behind Me, Satan
Sub-Department Of Stop Tempting My Husband, Bitch

Dateline: Saturday morning, circa 8 am, sitting at the breakfast table with MH.  MH picks up his copy of yesterday’s (Saturday) NYT crossword puzzle, which he hasn’t yet finished; he works on it a bit, then tells me he’s stuck with the 49 across clue and the down clues which cross the answer are not helping him.

Moiself  did the puzzle yesterday but can’t remember the clue.  MH reads it to me:

” ‘Noted tempter’ …I  can’t figure out the missing vowel;
I have “S _ _ AN.  SusanSusan is a noted tempter?”

He’s serious, and I can’t stop laughing.

 

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of Another Family Contemplation Of The Theory Of Relativity
Sub-Department Of My Daughter, The Content Creator

Dateline: Tuesday am.  We’ve had some home maintenance projects – new gutters and downspouts installed/exterior house painting – that are 99% completed.  MH shared pictures of the house exterior on our family’s message board, so that our offspring could see the progress.  The following hijinks exchange ensued.

MH:
All done. Except for a gutter adjustment tomorrow.

Moiself:
Actually/unfortunately, the gutter adjustment isn’t until Thursday.

MH:
I’m living in an alternate timeline.

(daughter) Belle:
If you don’t actually go to sleep tonight, then maybe Thursday is tomorrow?

Moiself:
Don’t go getting all quantum time bending on us.

Belle:
Is time a fixed variable that we have no influence over? Or is it a mutable part of the universe that we simply haven’t figured out how to manipulate yet?  Is our perception of time the definition of it?  So many things to consider.
But yeah, for now we’ll just say Thursday.

Moiself:
This conversation is so going in my blog.

 

Yeah, but what time is dinner?

*   *   *

Department Of The Best Pasta Shape Ever   [1]

That would be Sfoglini’s reginetti.  Soon I will be ordering another case of it (the whole grain, which is my fave) because I’m down to three boxes, and moiself  cannot be reginetti-less.

What is not to love about this shape – it’s like a teensy-weensy lasagna noodle.  Makes me happy just to look at it.

 

*   *   *

Department Of I Respectfully But Vehemently Disagree

Moiself  recently heard a Tony-nominated playwright interviewed on an NPR show ,   [2]  during which he talked about his years of struggle to write his play, and how he scraped by due to the kindness of friends.  He used his experience as an example of why “we need government funding” of the arts.  I guess he meant we need more funding than we already have ?  For as I heard him whine speak about the subject, I wondered if he was somehow not aware of the NEA and other state and local government grants and funds, as well as the hundreds of private individuals and organizations offering artistic grants and funding?

 

 

Dateline: Sunday evening watching the latter half of the 77th annual Toni awards. There is that same playwright – David Adjmi, accepting a Tony award his award for Best Play for Stereophonic.  In his acceptance speech, Adjmi gushed about how “this was a very hard journey, to get this play up here….” and named the friends who let him sleep on their couch for seven years so that he could write the play, and then, again:

“It’s really hard to make a career in the arts; we need to fund the arts in America – it is the hallmark of a civilized society….”

Admi brought himself to tears as he recalled his struggle.  Of course when he made the plea for funding there was the obligatory applause from Supporters Of The Arts ®, who must whoop it up reverently with their version of, say amen.  Preach, brother!

As I do with most preaching, be it religious or artistic, I’m listening, then thinking…

 

 

Adjmi decries how hard it is to earn a living in the arts. This is nothing new; it always has been hard to earn a living in the arts.  It always should be hard to earn a living in the arts.

I’m not denying his or any composer, singer, actor, writer, painter, potter or other artist’s struggle.  I *am* calling for all who have chosen to pursue their art to check their privilege – their sense of exceptionalism –  if they think, for whatever reason, that their particular job should not be a struggle, and/or is deserving of endowment.

Struggle is the common lot of most people in the working world, who do not receive any kind of artistic accolades nor have opportunites, e.g., award shows, for public forums in which they may complain about their struggles. They plow the fields, fix the cars bag the groceries manufacture the semi-conductors, empty the bedpans, collect the lab results, interpret the data, bake the bread, comfort the bereaved, put out the fires, clean the kettles, sweep the movie theaters, mend the crab pots, patrol the demilitarized zones…

Adjmi didn’t mentioned receiving financial aid or grants for Stereophonic, and his play’s success belies his plea for funding.  Somehow, he managed to produce this work of art without the government’s help – and  let us always remember that the translation of “the government,” means the tax dollars of moiself and y’all.

Save for those rare artists born to wealth (or the nepotistic receivers of artistic funding and opportunities), life in any artistic field has always been that of financial struggle before commercial success (and often afterward), usually involving multiple side jobs and other means of support.  How would the playwright who thinks there should be more public funding of the arts, and others who hold similar sentiments, define what would constitute more support of “the arts,” and who will get to define what is an art worthy of support, and which artists will get support, and for what length of time such support is given….?

There are museums and art galleries wherein I’ve lingered for hours, and others I’ve fled after15 minutes because, content, meh.  I’m a fan of performing arts and patronize live music, theater and other events.  There’ve been plays and concerts I’ve attended/movies I’ve seen where I left feeling entertained and even aesthetically transformed, and others – even a few ones which won prestigious awards and were recommended by “everyone”  [3]  –   where I left during intermission, or if I forced myself to stay to the bitter end, I left the venue thinking, Holy imaginative waste of time, how did this piece of embarrassingly trivial, reductionist, hackneyed crapola ever get produced? It’s a bad enough that I spent money on a ticket, but to subsidize this playwright’s/director’s/performer’s delusion that they are “artists” worthy of third party “support”….?

 

 

Sorry, starving artists.  Eat less, get a second job, a third job, a patron, a couch to surf on.  Struggle, like the rest of us. Government support for the arts? You take their money, you play by their rules.  In Russia during the USSR era there was little art seen by the public apart from that which was funded – or allowed – by the government.  Remember any great works of socialist realism that came out of the Soviet-sponsored art?

Socialist Realism
A form of modern realism imposed in Russia by Stalin following his rise to power after the death of Lenin in 1924, characterized in painting by rigorously optimistic pictures of Soviet life painted in a realist style

The doctrine was formally proclaimed by Maxim Gorky at the Soviet Writers Congress of 1934, although not precisely defined. In practice, in painting it meant using realist styles to create highly optimistic depictions of Soviet life. Any pessimistic or critical element was banned…. It was quite simply propaganda art, and has an ironic resemblance to the Fascist realism imposed by Hitler in Germany (see ITAL Entartete Kunst – degenerate art       [4] ).

(excerpt from the Tate Museum’s “Socialist Realism,” https://www.tate.org.uk/art/art-terms/s/socialist-realism  )

 

 

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [5]

 

*   *   *

Parting Shot:  I love it when/I hate it when…

I love it when I come across a new (to me) George Carlin witticism; I hate it when I remember that Carlin died years ago and isn’t here to reflect on today’s wackadoodle.

*   *   *

May you have strength when tempted by Susan;
May your art remain free of government supports and constraints;
May you decide to have a favorite pasta shape;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

 

[1] As decreed by the Most Omnipotent Italian Saucy  Epicurean  Loving  Foodie,  as in, moiself.

[2] Can’t remember which program…a Fresh Air interview, most likely?

[3] for example, not to deny the creativity and hard work of Lin Manuel Miranda, but I couldn’t abide Hamilton (or In the Heights) – both of which I so wanted and expected to like (or maybe, thought I *should* like).  With the rapid-fire, rap-ish dialog, I felt like the cast was shouting at me the whole time.

[4] Degenerate art ( Entartete Kunst)  is the label the Nazis applied to art they didn’t approve of – any art which did not extol or depict “Kinder, Küche, Kirche” ( family, home and church), which was the Nazi party’s and Hitler’s view of the virtues of German life. 

[5] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org