Department Of One Person‘s Cool Fact Is Another Person’s Bloodcurdling Nightmare
I count myself fortunate to be in the former camp, as per moiself’s reaction when I learned about the phenomenon known as spider rain.
Moiself had heard about spider “ballooning,” which is the way some hatchling spiders migrate and disperse.
But I didn’t know that a bunch of spiders ballooning at the same time is called a spider rain. Ain’t nature grand?
“Ballooning is a not-uncommon behavior of many spiders. They climb some high area and stick their butts up in the air and release silk. Then they just take off…. This is going on all around us all the time. We just don’t notice it.” (Rick Vetter, UCR arachnologist)
The reason people don’t usually notice this ingenious spider behavior is that it’s not common for millions of spiders to do this at the same time, and then land in the same place….In these kinds of events [spider rains], what’s thought to be going on is that there’s a whole cohort of spiders that’s ready to do this ballooning dispersal behavior, but for whatever reason, the weather conditions haven’t been optimal and allowed them to do that. But then the weather changes, and they have the proper conditions to balloon, and they all start to do it.” (Todd Blackledge, biology professor, University of Akron in Ohio).
(“Cloudy with a Chance of Arachnids?
Spider Rain’ Explained” livescience.com )
* * *
Department Of Celebrating That Which Also Needs Mourning
Thinking about the torturous path to women’s suffrage. As the hundredth anniversary of the 19th Amendment approaches, I’ve been listening to podcasts ( e.g., She Votes! Our Battle for the Ballot) and watching TV shows (e.g., American Experience: The Vote ) detailing the long history. Some of it I already knew, via college classes and independent reading. And, some of it I didn’t…and, as with many civil rights issues, learning the history is both illuminating and nauseating. The latter because of why there had to be a 19th amendment in the first place.
Two other amendments to the U.S. Constitution, the 14th – specifically, its first section, aka The Equal Protection Clause – and the 15th amendment in its entirety, should have taken care of that. Here are the referenced texts (my emphases)
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The reason the 19th amendment was needed to give women the vote is because gender/sex needed to be mentioned specifically…because, until it was, the14th and 15th amendments would not be applied, to women, by male jurists and lawmakers. The only conclusion possible for as to why, given the gender neutral language of the above amendments, is because women were not considered to be included in the terms “people, or “citizens.”
All together now:
Moiself has also been ruminating on the broader implications behind one of the more common arguments which was presented against women’s suffrage: the idea that the awesome responsibility of voting would take women “out of the home.”
This idea was accompanied by the usual horseshit arguments re a woman’s supposed “delicate feminine nature/sensibilities,” which might be jostled by the strain of voting and civic engagement. That is an interesting juxtaposition with the argument that the importance and rigors of child-reading and household maintaining were such that only women were qualified to do them, yet no one argued that *those* particular rigors were too much for the delicate female nature.
Education; employment; political action – anything which might distract (read: unshackle) women from what was considered to be their primary sphere – taking care of home and husband and children – was threatening to most men. Some folks even used the lame argument that granting women equal voting rights to men would be a “come down” from women’s “superior” position That absurdity argument held that the raising of children made women the fictional proverbial power behind the throne, and that by raising future (male) leaders and voters women could more effectively influence public policy than by actually voting themselves. 
Really; they used that argument.
All of the emphasis on The Home ®- that a loving, stable, well-run household and the rearing of children are the foundations of civilization – guess what? No argument from moiself on that account – although I strongly differ as to the relegation of such important work to only one gender.
But using that reason – the paramount importance of household management and child-rearing – as an argument to deny voting to half the human population holds about as much water as a cheesecloth catheter bag.
The thing is, men truly didn’t believe the argument themselves, or they would have taken over the management of home and children.
Yes this is so incredibly important- the most important thing in the world, actually!…but we want someone else to do it, and we want them to remain mostly invisible, and have no political power.
History shows us that anything patriarchal societies deem to be of upmost importance they also declare women as being incapable of, and/or forbidden by “nature” (read: religion), of successfully doing.
If the preparation and maintaining of a household and the raising of children were indeed considered to be of supreme importance to society, where was the remuneration for doing so – then, as well as now? Child-rearing and household management, for women at least and for the most part, continue to be all-encompassing “jobs” which have no independent financial recompense, professional status, or safety net. 
So, yeah. The 100th anniversary of MORE THAN HALF THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY obtaining the right to vote…a mere ONE HUNDRED FORTY FOUR YEARS after their country is founded…is noteworthy, and the struggle for our country’s universal suffrage should be better known and taught. But the more I learn about what the struggle entailed, the less cartwheels I feel like doing.
And besides, mine would look something like this.
* * *
Department Of I Hate The Fact That The Analogy Is So Apropos
Friend JWW’s disturbingly astute observations, shared on Facebook, after the first presidential  debate:
I am afraid of this president. If this is how he comports himself in front of the whole United States of America on national TV….
He was threatening and says if he does not win the election then things will not end well. What is that supposed to mean? If he doesn’t win what is he going to do? This makes me very frightened about what the future holds for the USA.
I am also afraid because I am a woman and this president sounds like an abusive husband or boyfriend. I am afraid because if a woman wants to leave a guy like that, she has to be afraid that if she does leave, he will come and hunt her down and kill her and her children. There is no way out. Restraining orders don’t work. So many women are killed even when the guy has a restraining order against him.
We need to vote him out. Vote him out. Vote him out.
And even then we are not sure he will leave.
* * *
Pun For The Day
Why hasn’t #45  ever finished a novel?
Because he always gets stuck in Chapter 11.
* * *
May you remember to vote him out;
May you remind everyone you know to vote him out;
May you convince total strangers at the grocery store to vote him out;
…and may the hijinks ensue.
Thanks for stopping by. Au Vendredi!
* * *
 There were some women making the same argument, which should not be surprising, considered that they as well as men were subject to the same cultural mythos, forces and expectations.
 Other than via financial dependency upon a spouse, which can disappear at drop of a hat (as in a divorce decree or death certificate).
 There was nothing presidential about #45’s deportment.
 Aka Little Chief Bunker Bitch, and other assorted monikers employed by those of us who love our country and thus cannot bear to use the given name of the man who shits all over it.