Home

The Rapists I’m Not (Yet) Advocating Killing

2 Comments

Department Of Who Said,
The More Things Change The More They Remain The Same

Apparently, it was a French journalist Jean-Baptiste Alphonse Karr.  And what he said, in French (surprise!) and in 1849, was,

“Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.”


Historians say Karr was expressing his cynicism about the likelihood that the recent French Revolution (1848), or any political disruption or reform, might be able to change human behavior and social structures.

In choosing that department title, moiself  doesn’t mean to imply there’s been no social progress since the mid-nineteenth century.  But the chilling story of the so-called Cornell Seven has a heart breaking, odiferous stench of familiarity to it.  It has given moiself  the ____ – I don’t know the right word; the impetus?  The permission? – to write about my own memorable encounter with the pack animal mentality that can be nurtured and even protected in our misogynous and sexist culture…and in particular, in all-male “bro” environments such as fraternities.

 

 

For those readers living under the proverbial rock, [1]  here’s a (very, very) brief summary of what has come to be called the Cornell Seven story – a criminal incident which was mishandled by the Cornell police and only came to light recently when the victim filed a civil complaint. Do your own research for more of the disturbing details (which include Snapchat messages the rapists sent to other fraternity members inviting them to join in the assault)…but if you do so,  I’d advise having an emesis basin handy:

“The 101-page complaint states that (Jane Doe) ‘was plied with alcohol and drugs to the point of intoxication’ at the fraternity house, and alleges in graphic detail that she was sexually assaulted and raped by members of the fraternity over the course of about seven hours….
 (excerpt, The Washington Post, “What to know about
the Cornell University rape allegations”)

 

 

I’d been saving (?) this story, my own story of facing frat misogyny (don’t worry; I was not assaulted, physically).  There have been times over the decades where it has come back to me, and I knew I’d write about it, eventually.  But the when eluded moiself, until….

 

*   *   *

Department Of Notes I Wrote To Moiself  in 2015

The notes were prompted by news of the SAE-OU racist chant incident:

The University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racist incident…occurred on March 7, 2015, when members of the University of Oklahoma (OU) chapter of Sigma Alpha Epsilon (SAE) were filmed performing a racist song that used the word ‘nigger’ and referenced Jim Crow….

On March 7, 2015, two videos were recorded of SAE members and their dates riding on a chartered bus to the Oklahoma City Golf & Country Club, where an event celebrating the national organization’s Founder’s Day was being held. In the video the students are heard singing a chant to the tune of the nursery rhyme “If You’re Happy and You Know It“. Below is how the chant was sung:

‘There will never be a nigger at SAE/There will never be a nigger at SAE
You can hang ’em from a tree/But they’ll never sign with me,
There will never be a nigger at SAE.’ “
(excerpts Wikipeda, 2015 U. of Oklahoma SAE racism incident )

 

SAE’s website’s home page lists SAE’s motto as,
“The true gentleman starts here.”

*   *   *

The notes I wrote to moiself  (in my file of possible blog subjects):

“the thing w/the SAE chant; my experiences w/UCD frat…how much detail go into? So not surprising about the SAE thing – the big ruckus when it’s racism, not sexism. Someday, tell. details/how much to tell…haven’t decided yet. The vile songs/chants – I unfortunately have the original “sheet music.” The names…anonymous or anagram-ized.”

*   *   *

Department Of Background To The Details

Even back in the late 1970s-early 1980s, other fraternities were using the  “But we’re not as bad as SAE” defense  [2]  whenever they got in trouble. And frats were always getting in trouble.  And you do realize that frat is an anagram for fart.

 

 

Once again, I digress.

Dateline: University of California at Davis, late 1970s. The Greek Life was not especially big at my alma mater, with less than 10% of students belonging to fraternities.  Not being the “type” to be interested in that culture, I didn’t have many friends – well, any friends – who were frat members,   [3] and didn’t pay much attention to their goings-on, until The Lupe Incident was all over the local news.

The Aggie, UCD’s student newspaper, broke the story.   [4]  Background:  Fraternities each had their own songbooks, which they distributed to their pledges.  The books consisted of lyrics to songs and chants which the pledges were required to learn and which the frat members would drunkenly howl recite at parties and meetings, from frat-only events to gatherings where one fraternity made fun of/insulted its rival fraternities.  Late in 1975, a Latino frat pledge objected to a certain song in his fraternity’s (Alpha Gamma Rho – AGR) songbook.  The pledge leaked a copy of the song to the campus Chicano/Latino organizations and community members, and “The Lupe Incident” was born.

The lyrics of “Lupe” sing the…uh…praises…   [5]  of a goodtime Latina  ( “…my fun-loving/cock-sucking Mexican whore,” who, among her many  sexual attributes, “tastes better than blueberry pie” ).  The Latino pledge and the wider Chicano community held that the song specifically degraded Mexican women.  [6]   By early 1976 hundreds of Latino students and allies organized and staged protests and presented a list of demands to AGR and to UCD administrators.  AGR officially apologized and…I’m not sure of the other consequences. But the incident left a sour taste in my mouth, one that had little to do with a vulgar, racist and sexist song referencing performing oral sex on a Latina named for a beloved figure in Mexican Catholicism.

 

 

Forward to late 1979.  [7]   One of my apartment mates, Yanny, was a personal friend of mine.  [8]  Yanny was also a friend of my boyfriend, Jay; both were seniors.  Jay had surprised me when, as a junior, he’d joined a fraternity (“SEF”  [9] ), and also when he ran for the vice-presidency of SEF during his senior year.  He’d defended joining his particular fraternity by saying that SEF was the “nerd” fraternity – composed of engineering majors (like him), and that they were good guys….  We’d been around the block with that issue, and I had even gone to a couple of frat parties with him, to be a good sport.   [10]  Jay had parental urging (read: pressure) re how joining a frat would provide him with post-graduate networking opportunities, and besides, he said, he could eat at the frat for free several times a week    [11]….and SEF wasn’t a *real* frat, more of a social club….

Also, by being SEF’s vice president, Jay said that he could have some positive influence should stereotypical frat behavior creep into the SEF ranks.  So.  Jay knew my opinion of fraternities (one step above pit toilets re their contribution to civilization); he’d heard my arguments that research shows frat members have a higher risk for subjecting women to sexual coercion/assault, and that the culture’s structure/social events often treat women as sexual commodities, or at least reinforce outdated models of patriarchal masculinity, and that frats are exclusivist and elitist institutions which still practice segregation and hazing and promote conformity to groupthink and are frequently linked to dangerous consumption of alcohol and “recreational” drugs and promote so-called brotherhood (protection of their membership from consequences of their wrongdoing) over accountability….

 

 

I’d said my piece.  Jay disagreed with some of my points, agreed with others, and joined SEF.  As did Yanny, early in his senior year, when Jay and another friend invited him to do so.   It was funny to me, now and then, that Yanny came to me seeking my opinion – absolution ? – re his decision.  I’m sure he’d already decided to join SEF; nevertheless, I heard his confession, which was almost word-for-word the reasons/excuses offered by Jay (some mumbling the party line about how frats raise money for charity and promote leadership and fellowship and organizational skills; he could eat for free at the frat several times a week; his father said it would be a good networking opportunity….).

 

 

One weekday afternoon, a few weeks after Yanny joined SEF, he and I were home in our apartment, chatting in the living room.  Knowing he’d recently attended a SEF event, I asked Yanny about how his frat life was going. Was it as dull as he’d reassured me?  Probably nothing along the Lupe lines, eh?  Yanny laughed…kinda sorta.  A  there’s-something-I-gotta-tell-you  can be communicated via an uncomfortable laugh, and it was definitely communicated in Yanny’s.  We briefly discussed the Lupe incident, and I brought up the fact that I’d been cynical about the Latino pledgeboy’s righteous indignation about the so-called insult to his heritage:

“What if the girl’s name in the song had been ‘raceless,’ or sans ethnic identity?  If it were ‘Sally‘ being debased in song, would he have protested the song’s demeaning sexual references, or joined in singing it with gusto? ‘Racism, well, okay boys, I guess we can’t get away with that anymore, but degrading women is fine…. ‘ “

Oh, you have no idea; you were right, Yanny said.  I was confused; I asked Yanny what idea I should have, and what was I right about?  Yanny kept repeating that phrase, in several different ways, saying that I was right, that “really bad stuff” still abounds in the frat culture, even in the “better” ones.  He said he’d received SEF’s songbook, and, “Boy, if you saw that…well, you really should see that.  There’s several… one really bad…. No, really; you should see that.”  Why should I see…what?  I asked him.  What would I see?  He repeated several times that I would be shocked by what I’d see in the songbook – which was on top of his desk – but I really should see it…but he has to go to class…but, yeah, I should see that songbook, …and it’s on his desk, and he has to go to class….

 

 

Yanny darted into his bedroom. I heard paper-shuffling sounds; he returned to the living room with his bookbag and announced that he was off to class. All alone in the apartment, I remained on the couch for a minute, bemused by the fact that Yanny had just spent several minutes essentially telling me that I should go to his room and look at the SEF songbook.  So, I did.

Yanny’s bedroom door was wide open. I took the songbook from atop his desk (it was the only object on his desk, angled in a way that practically bellowed, HERE I AM. [12]  I took it with me to the living room, sat down on the couch, and thumbed through it.  The book consisted of pages of mimeographed chants and songs, ranging in content from silly/stupid to vulgar to inuendo-and-scatological reference-filled.  Several of the chants touted SEF’s superiority to other fraternities. The one about Sigma Nu, a rival frat, was particularly, graphically memorable:

Butt fuck, Butt fuck
Gonorrhea goo
Lift up the cow’s tail
Out comes Sigma Nu

Ah yes, lads:  enlighten me once again about how fraternities promote leadership, brotherhood, community service, gentlemanly behavior, and social maturation.

Then there was The Song.  The one I assumed Yanny had wanted me to see.  It had music accompanying the lyrics, which were set to the tune of “When the Caissons Go Rolling Along.”  The song’s title was, “When The End Of The Month Rolls Along.”

Summary:  the song’s many, many verses lament how you – as a guy – aren’t going to “get any” when the end of the month rolls around; that is, when your targeted female sex partner is having her menstrual period:

“You can tell by her waddle there’s a tampon up her twaddle” …
“You can tell by her fanny that you won’t be getting any…”

Feeble rhyme schemes along with vulgar misogyny – what a surprise.

Those are a the milder lyrics; I’ll spare y’all all of the verses and chorus.

As I sat trembling on the couch, I wish I’d spared moiself  from the  “ditty” of sexism, from the girls-are-really-disgusting-and-unclean-but-at-least-some-times-we-can-fuck-them  sentiments, all set to the tune of a patriotic marching anthem.

 

 

I knew I had to do something.

I had Jay’s class schedule written down; he had classes for the entire afternoon. I wanted to “warn” him what I was going to do, but there was no way to do so (this was pre-cellphones/home phone answering machines; there was no way to contact him).  As I biked to campus, the songbook in my backpack, I thought that perhaps it was best that there was no way to tell him, lest he might somehow convince me to ignore what I’d seen.

I made two photocopies of the songbook, and took them to the campus Women’s Resource and Research Center.

 

 

You might think that a counselor (read: righteous feminist advocate) at a campus Women’s Center would have urged me to go public no matter what, but she didn’t.  The concern she showed for *me,* re the possible personal blowback to moiself, was the one good thing to come out of that mess.  I will never forget her kindness, the look of concern on her face, when I’d presented her with the material and asked her assistance in…in doing what, exactly?  What was the right thing to do?  She didn’t seem to think I was a coward for hesitating even for a second to pursue having this festering turd of woman-hating filth brought into the open. This was decades before the MeToo movement, but the reality of what could happen when a woman spoke up about such things… She said that *she* understood the cost of doing so, but, did I? 

After discussing the situation with me and consulting with other Women’s Center staff, she said she would not (immediately) contact the press or the school administration, but would first talk to the SEF president, and get back to me.  The campus phone system had the capability of doing multiple line calls, and the next day she arranged a call between herself, moiself, and the SEF president.

The SEF president – what a piece of work.  I could practically smell his fear over the phone line, and his groveling mendacity made me want to wash my hands after hanging up from the call.  He repeatedly, gushingly assured me that he was not angry with me, that those chants and songs were not a true reflection of the “mission” of dignity and brotherhood promoted by of the Greek system…

(The more he touted the virtues of fraternities, the more I heard…
 Butt fuck, Butt fuck /Gonorrhea goo…)

…and that he was really, truly, sorry for my distress; and that this was a wakeup call, this was actually for the good of the fraternity, a chance for them to live up to their goals of good citizenship and character development and maturation and….

( Butt fuck, Butt fuck /Gonorrhea goo… )

…why, this incident might even, ultimately, make them better people!  He was almost glad they got “caught.”

 

 

Message received, dude.  Like all clandestinely braying racist/gay-bashing/misogynist vampires who wither under the light of exposure, the only thing SEF Prezboy was sorry for was for getting caught.  And he was so creepily smooth about it.  At any moment during the call I half-expected him to inform the counselor and moiself  that we all, in fact, saw eye-to-eye, and could he count on our vote in November?

Nevertheless, the three of us agreed on a course of action.  SEF Prezboy promised he would instruct all frat members to destroy their copies of the songbook, and he personally would sweep the frathouse to make sure every last copy was accounted for.  The counselor agreed to destroy the copy I’d given her, and I agreed to destroy my copy.  [13]

And, with no evidence, he is free to later turn around and deny the content, I thought, even as I was agreeing to destroy my copy.   So of course I lied. I kept my copy.

I lied ( “Yes, believe me, I don’t want to keep such filth around” ) and felt good about it.   I lied to that needledick fraudster, who only said what he said as he felt the knife of exposure at his neck.  Of course I kept the evidence.  I remember thinking, This weasel-butted snakeoil salesman is going to run for office one day, and I need to be prepared to take him down, if necessary.  [14]

 

 

But that was the next day.  That night, after I’d returned from the Women’s Center, I phoned Jay.  I asked him to please come to my apartment – I had something to tell him, but not over the phone. I told Yanny what I’d done, and he didn’t bat the proverbial eyelash.  He said it was probably best if he were not in the apartment when Jay came over, and left to go study in the library.

The frustration, outrage, and ultimately the sadness that I felt on so many levels – culturally, politically, personally – I tried to articulate them to Jay. To his credit, my boyfriend didn’t try to defend…anything.  He was obviously (to me) unhappy that I hadn’t told him what I’d planned to do ( as if I’d planned anything, I said – I’d acted, reacted, on gut-wrenching instinct).  But he said very little.  He listened to me; he wisely chose not to defend the indefensible. At one point he mumbled some mealy-mouthed comment about working from the inside to change things, then dropped that.  And as I was listening to him trying to find a way to sincerely apologize, I realized that we – he and I – had no future.

 

Actually, no Martha, it wasn’t.

 

Department Of The Aftermath

I didn’t break up with Jay, not right then.  Yet I knew that I would, eventually, because I’d realized that I no longer respected him.  Maybe it’s not even respect.  I was disappointed that Jay didn’t seem to see how important it was, the issues behind the When The End Of The Month Rolls Around lyrics – how important it was and *should* be, for all humans, not only women.  I was disappointed that he didn’t feel the same way as I did about such poison, despite him being One Of The Good Guys®, a guy who (thought he) would never knowingly participate in promoting misogyny, hatred, or vitriol of any kind….

In a way, that was unfair of moiself.  Of course, Jay couldn’t feel the same way that I did.  How could he, in the world of upper-class white male privilege from whence he came and in which he lived?  The word *privilege,* when referring to the isms (e.g., racism/ sexism/classism), has been accused of being overused, but that doesn’t make it any less valuable or applicable.  We didn’t have the term then, but, looking back, that’s what it was. Jay’s privilege prevented him from understanding my simmering rage, and also that which was even more important to the future of our relationship: my spirit-enervating disheartenment.

 

 

If there was any harassment or blowback to Jay, he never mentioned it to me (nor did Yanny).  I got the strong impression that SEF Prezboy was determined to keep what had happened on the down low; he wanted to act as if the songbook never existed, and did not want it getting out to anyone, even/especially the other SEF bros, that their veep’s bitch girlfriend had ratted them out.  I remember considering that possibility – of blowback to Jay –  then thinking, Actually, I’m not a bitch, but consequences are….  Jay was their effin’ veep; he had to have known what was in SEF’s “songbook.”

I felt no satisfaction in doing (what to this day I still consider) the right thing.  For a long time afterward, I just felt…numb.  There was no great victory; just disappointment at yet another revelation of organized, institutionalized, male ass-hattery/sexism and woman-hating disguised as boys-will-be-boys hijinks, the reaction to which the frat president probably/privately considering overreacting by two radical militant feminist man-haters.  And the relationship with the boy I loved, whom I broke up with a few months later and whom I still consider to be one of the more decent, well-meaning people I have ever known, was collateral damage.

*   *   *

Freethinkers’ Thought Of The Week     [15]

 

 

*   *   *

May you do the right thing, no matter how it feels;
May it eventually feel good when you do the right thing;
even if at first it feels so awful;
May every frat boy someday be required to have the
How To Avoid Sexual Assault guide tattooed on his chest;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

*   *   *

[1] a preferred residence, I can understand, given the news as of late…and a place I tried to hide under when I first heard of the story.

[2] and the “joke” was that SAE stood for, Sexual Assault Expected

[3] What little contact I had with the Greek system was with frats; sororities were new to UCD (not on campus until 1973) and I’m not writing about them here.

[4] But their current website, I was unable to find a reference…don’t know how far back their online archives go, and I wasn’t interested in spending hours searching.

[5] In horny fratboy terms

[6] “Lupe,” a common name for Guadalupe, references the sacred cultural and spiritual figure of Mexico’s Virgen de Guadalupe (Our Lady of Guadalupe). 

[7] I’d graduated that June, traveled the summer after graduation and returned to the apartment I shared with three other students.  I stayed for several months, seeking a job related to my major, before heading to the Bay Area in early 1980.

[8] All names (except Lupe) are nicknames/pseudonyms

[9] “Stupid Engineer Frat” – yes, even (some) organizations get pen names here.

[10] I did attend two parties held at his fraternity; not all that memorable (in fact kinda boring) , certainly not the high raunch other frats were known for

[11] He wouldn’t be living at the fraternity; not all frat houses had living or dorm like capacities, and most of the members of his fraternity did not live at the house.

[12] Which was usually a mess, piled high with papers and notebooks and texts, but which he’d cleared off – that was the paper shuffling I’d heard.

[13] There would be no press contacted re this (although he and the counselor were going to work out something with the administration…I’m not sure if the reported him or his fraternity).

[14] To this day have some of the evidence (copies of the songs/chants) in my files, but I (mercifully) don’t remember the SEF president’s name.

[15] “free-think-er n. A person who forms opinions about religion on the basis of reason, independently of tradition, authority, or established belief. Freethinkers include atheists, agnostics and rationalists.   No one can be a freethinker who demands conformity to a bible, creed, or messiah. To the freethinker, revelation and faith are invalid, and orthodoxy is no guarantee of truth.”  Definition courtesy of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, ffrf.org

The Pity I’m Not Tempering

Comments Off on The Pity I’m Not Tempering

Department Of Things That Make You Jump Out Of Bed In A Cold Sweat (Five Minutes Before Your Alarm Is Scheduled To Go Off), Silently Screaming,
What Have I Done To Deserve This?

I refer to the phenomena of earworms, in this case, specifically and horrifically, when the earworm is something along the lines of…I can’t bear to type the title.

 

 

 

Rumor has it that US Intelligence officials forced suspected terrorists imprisoned at Guantanamo to listen to this song when water boarding proved to be an ineffective interrogation technique.

 

*   *   *

Department Of Justifying Eating Movie Popcorn On A Daily Basis

MH and son K were gone last week, on a Grand Canyon rafting trip. I was alone in the house, save for the cats and too many litter boxes. As for the latter, I had choice words for K upon his return, suggesting that he might want to scoop his particular cat’s box more frequently.  Moiself  did not appreciate spending what seemed like hours dismantling the (admittedly, visually stunning) Stonehenge of Piss that Tootsie,  [1] his cat, had been assembling in the right rear corner of her litter box.

 

 

 

Imagine the above, only constructed of cat pee-soaked litter. If there’d been a way to get rid of the overpowering stench of ammonia I might have considered its revenue-generating potential as a tourist attraction…..

Ah, but I digress.

I did not accompany my boys on the rafting adventure for a variety of reasons, one of the most compelling being saving the $$ I would have spent on that trip for an upcoming travel adventure of my own.  Friend CC and I will, possibly before the end of the year, travel to Sweden to visit our “Swenadian”   [2]  friends and former neighbors SS and her husband CS, who are now living and working in (you guessed it) Sweden.  This trip promises to be equally as scenic and memorable as any river expedition, and (I assume) will not involve us having to tow a barge of our feces behind us on a raft.

 

Y’all know the wilderness travel motto: pack it in, pack it out.   [3]

 

 

Yet another digression. I must be channeling my inner eleven year old, what with the pee and poop references. I know what you’re expecting next, so let’s just get it out of the way:

Q: Why do cherry trees stink?
A: Because George Washington ‘cut one.’

 

 

 

 

But no – wait! My initial intent was to stylishly segue into a story about seeing movies; that is,  my quest to see a movie a day, in a movie theater,  [4]  while MH and K and other raft loads of happy campers were relieving themselves in the mighty Colorado River.

From the big studio summer blockbusters to the smaller, “artier” releases, I am happy to report, Mission Accomplished. I saw:

–Book Club
-Avengers: Infinity War
-Solo: A Star Wars…something (you know the name)
-A Quiet Place
-Life of the Party
-Tully
-First Reformed
-Deadpool 2
-The Rider

 

There are still many more movies on my want-to-see wish list to see, but I need a break from doing so. The one drawback to seeing a movie every day is that you are also seeing, every day, the same promos for cable/streaming service TV series and Coca-Cola ads and the other screen nonsense which has become ubiquitous in movie theatres (the poorly-named “entertainment” before the previews of coming attractions).

As a result, I am determined now, more than ever, to not see a TV show that I admittedly would have had little interest in the first place, but after days in a row bombarded by its loud, vapid  [5]   promos, I’ve decided I would rather claw my own eyes out than even be in the same room where a screen is showing anything related to Claws.

 

 

 

 

 

I got the feeling the Claws promos were trying to convince me that the show is about female empowerment, which is not the first (or even twenty-first) idea that comes to mind when I’m watching five women manicurists flashing their hideous finger deformities ludicrously long, garishly painted fingernails and “clothed” ala the woman in the middle – who seems to be the series’ protagonist and who, in the promos, is featured packed into a series of squeeze-me-like-a-sausage-and-ogle-my-T-&-A outfits.

Am I the only one who, when she sees a lady-person thusly attired, wants to take a long, thin, pointed metal something – a cake tester, say – and prick that lady-person in several of her cartoonish/bulbous lady-parts (starting of course with her ginormously swollen boobs) to see if she then flies all over the room, bouncing from ceiling to corners like a rapidly deflating, body-shaped balloon?

Just wondering.

 

*   *   *

*   *   *

Department Of Being Thankful To, And For, Ronan Farrow

In a recent Fresh Air interview, host Terri Gross interviewed Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, author, UNICEF activist, (former) government adviser and lawyer and way-too-well-adjusted-for-being-the-son-of-two-famous-people-one-of-whom-is-a-creep, Ronan Farrow.  [6]

Ronan Farrow won this year’s Pulitzer for Public Service   [7]  for his articles in The New Yorker on the sexual assault charges brought against Harvey Weinstein. While investigating the story, Farrow faced harassment and intimidation from Weinstein’s cohorts,   [8] (including threats of physical harm from Weinstein himself), as well as discouragement and warnings from his bosses and colleagues:

Fresh Air host Terry Gross: …And then you were continuing to report for NBC but maybe as a result – I think as a result of the Harvey Weinstein reporting you wanted to do – that they were not anxious to have you pursue – that job ended, but you were kind of out in the cold for a while.

Ronan Farrow: Yes, that’s right. There was a low point last year where I did not know if I would have a job in journalism in a matter of weeks or indeed ever again and was being told by some very powerful people that I would never work again and, you know, also being told by some pretty sensible-sounding people around me you’ve got to just let this go. Just let it go, and your career will be fine. And if you don’t, it’s all over. And yeah, that the reality is…

TG: When you say let the story go, you mean the Harvey Weinstein story.

RF: The Harvey Weinstein reporting. I had been ordered to stop reporting and cancel interviews, and I didn’t

In the FA interview Farrow comes across as exceedingly intelligent, well-informed, passionate and articulate, yet refreshingly modest and self-deprecating for…well, for anyone, but especially for someone who has done so much already in his relatively young life, and who was one of those genius children (went to college at age eleven, then law school at age sixteen, then….).

Someone like Farrow, a young person possessing an open, sharp and inquiring mind and a strong work ethic and an interest in many fields, could have gone into any kind of law, or science or medicine or finance.  He chose investigative journalism, a discipline of uncovering and speaking the truth to both the powerful and the power-less; a job which – always, IMHO, but especially in these crazy, dangerous times – ranks right up there, in terms of its value to humanity, with the scientists and engineers who are working to save us from ourselves (read: find solutions to global warming and the degradation of our habitat).  And Farrow did this at a time when journalists are not only facing shrinking professional opportunities worldwide, but are also increasingly under attack, both verbally and physically (by those afore-mentioned powerful interests).

 

 

 

 

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of I Am Somewhat Puzzled By My Second Reaction

When I told MH about the FA interview with Ronan Farrow and how my first reaction was to be impressed by Farrow’s accomplishments and aspirations, I also mentioned my second reaction, and how it caught moiself off guard.  I was not expecting to feel what I felt: a moment of pity for Woody Allen, Farrow’s biological father.

Ronan Farrow and his mother and family are famously estranged – with good reasons, to put it mildly – from Allen.  I am on Team Farrow in this matter. Whenever I have cause to think of Allen I feel my mouth curl upward in a contemptuous sneer,    [9]  yet this time, after learning more about and hearing from Ronan Farrow, my Allen-induced scorn was, at least momentarily, tempered by pity.  How much has Allen has lost, and how much will he continue to lose, by not being able to know this fine young man as a son?

 

 

Even the sloth finds it a sorry situation…and when was the last time you saw a sad sloth?

 

 

 

 

 

*   *   *

 

 

 

May you avoid toilet humor distractions while trying to tell a simple story;
May your earworms be something classical, or at least classy;
May you appreciate investigative journalists and other unsung heroes;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

 

 

 

 

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

 

*   *   *

 

 

[1] So named because she is a polydactyl, aka Hemingway cat.

[2] She is Canadian; he is Swedish.

[3] Aka the “latrine raft” or “the groover.”

[4] Netflix offerings in a home theater doesn’t count.

[5] My impression of the series, after sitting through the promos.

[6] That creep would be his biological father, Woody Allen. Fuck yeah, I think he’s guilty.

[7] which he shared with The New York Times journalists Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey, for their reporting on the #MeToo movement).

[8] Weinstein hired Black Cube, the Israeli private intelligence company, to target his accusers and also those reporting on the accusations (such as Farrow), to try to smear and intimidate them and suppress the reporting.

[9] The kind I reserve for human scum like trophy hunters and, oh, pedophiles and child molesters.

The Peasant Food I’m Not Upscaling

Comments Off on The Peasant Food I’m Not Upscaling

Department of Not Surprised, But Still Sad

I recently read Junot Diaz’ acclaimed article in the New Yorker (The Silence: The Legacy of Childhood Trauma), wherein he revealed publicly for the first time his own history of childhood sexual abuse . [1]    It was a stirring account, to say the least.

I’ve never been fond of nor impressed by Diaz’s short fiction – and haven’t read but a few of his stories because the ones I did read left the proverbial bleech taste in my mouth, due in most part to the male-female dynamic found within. His style and themes reminded me of a more contemporary, multicultural Norman Mailer (and other acclaimed alpha male writers whose work I loathed, fiction writers who used their supposed hyper-realism narrative styles to impart their own loathing for women in any roles other than as their objects of sexual desire ). Ah, but for years Diaz was the new/exotic literary sensation in town, so who was this middle-aged white lady to judge?

Having undergone  sexual abuse seems particularly difficult for men to admit to; thus, my cynicism at his revelation shamed moiself. Cynicism as in, I thought that perhaps this (his essay) was his way of explaining/justifying (what I saw as) the sexism in his writing (a phenomenon too often explained/excused, for male writers, by literary “talent”    [2] )…

But that bit o’ skepticism was not my first response to the why reveal this now?-ness of his essay. My immediate, gut reaction was,  He’s laying the groundwork….  Translation: someone is going to accuse him of  Metoo conduct, and this (I did what I did because of what was done to me), overtly or implicitly, will be his defense.

And shame on me for thinking that.

I kept my opinion to moiself – now, there’s an admission you won’t often hear  – and was glad I did so.

 

 

 

 

 

Then came the story in last Friday’s New York Times, wherein Diaz was speaking at a writer’s conference:

The writer Zinzi Clemmons stood up. Without identifying herself by name, she asked Mr. Díaz about a recent essay he had published in The New Yorker detailing the sexual assault he experienced as an 8-year-old boy. She then asked why he had treated her the way he had six years prior, when she was a graduate student at Columbia….

Ms. Clemmons said she believed that Mr. Díaz had tried to pre-empt accusations like hers by writing the autobiographical essay in The New Yorker last month 

Other accusations of his misconduct have since surfaced;  Diaz resigned his position on the Pulitzer Prize board as the allegations are being investigated.

I feel bad about this; I take no joy in having my cynicism validated. I am not questioning the validity of Diaz’s report of childhood abuse. And the thing of it is, and it could be true that he abused his power over women as a direct (or oblique) result of his own history of being abused.  Or, these could be separate issues. Either way, all ways, it’s just….sad.

*   *   *

 

We Interrupt The Ranting For A Moment Of Gratitude

Deep thought of the day: a rubber chicken does not, in fact, have to be made of rubber, to embody the essence of the rubber chicken.

Translation: Mere words cannot express my feeling that there is an ultimate rightness to the universe, when I am presented with evidence that some mahvelous people, when they encounter an object which reminds them of a rubber chicken, are reminded of moiself.  [3]

Thanks, JWW.

 

 

Whaddya think, is she’s one of us?

 

*   *   *

We now Return To The Previously Scheduled Ranting

*   *   *

Department Of Yet Another Reason To Scream At A Screen
Adjunct Department Of  Yes, I Should (And Do) Know Better

My afternoon exercise sessions often occur around the time when the local Decades TV station runs episodes of Rowan and Martin’s Laugh-In. If I am not working out to one of my exercise DVDs, I’ll tune in to the Laugh-In reruns. I’ll admit to thoroughly enjoying the retro fun of it all, including memories of watching it when it originally aired.

 

 

Can we ever forget – or forgive – the show that introduced the world to Tiny Tim?

 

 

 

I remember how moiself and my buddies would take turns watching Laugh-In at each other’s houses, sprawled on our stomachs on the living room floor, usually with our parents seated behind us, sitting in their armchairs, also watching the show.  Our fun was enhanced by the prideful, barely stifled giggles that can only be produced by eleven-to-thirteen year olds who realized that the grownups and were laughing for different reasons (and at different times) than we were. Translation: many of the naughty jokes/double entendre‘s Laugh-In was known for– and almost all of the drug references – zoomed over our parents’ heads.

Fast forward to the present, and I am finding that for every skit or joke I enjoy and relive, I also marvel at how dated much of the show’s humor is.  [4]  What is particularly striking to me is how Laugh-In  – considered ahead of its time by tweaking the customs and prejudices of society – trafficked in so much hackneyed humor that was beholden to its time, in many cases reinforcing (not critiquing) stereotypes of ethnic minorities and gays and (especially) women.

Once again, I digress.

 

 

 

 

So. The danger to television-as-backdropexercising is that I am often in the middle of, say, lifting a dumbbell when the show goes to commercial, and thus am unable to hit the remote’s mute button. The commercials for daytime TV shows can be particularly odious, as the demographic is obviously considered to be the target audience for Certain Products For Those Of A Certain Age (read: elderly/infirmity drugs and diet plans).

One particular/frequently running ad is exceptionally…oh, how can I put it? It frosts my butt.  The second time I saw it  [5]  I realized, between biceps curls, that I had begun yelling at the television screen, at the two perky, formerly in shape and now chunky, E list celebrities (a former actor married to a former football player)  [6]  reduced to hocking a snake oil potion enthusiastically promoting a weight loss product. With no sense of irony and a surplus of golly gee this seems too good to be true, but it is! pride, they actually recited the following dialog:

 

* We eat our favorite foods and still lose four times more weight!

*Nothing in your lifestyle needs to change!
(as a picture of the implied favorites, foods-that-once-may-have-been-many-different-colors-but-which-now-are-all-deep-fat-fried-yellow ®, flashes by on the screen.)

 

 

 

 

 

And there I am, screaming at a screen, at the asinine and totally bogus “promises” repeated, again and again, about how “nothing in your lifestyle has to change….

but it’s your fucking lifestyle that got you this way in the first place  — it’s that junk you’ve been eating that did this to you and but now you’re boasting that you can continue eating the same rubbish ?!?!?

And of course, the grammar cop in me is irritated by the ad’s claims that a person using the weight loss supplement can “lose 4 times as much/more weight!”

Okay…I’m waiting…but there is no follow-up. Excuse me, aren’t y’all forgetting something?  “As much/more” are comparisons, and thus require comparatives.

 

 

Hold still and this won’t hurt as much.

 

 

 

“Lose 4 times as much/more weight!”!”  As much or as more as what, pray tell? As much as a person who’s never used the product but keeps scarfing their favorite foods faster than a hotdog-eating contest competitor on death row?  More than a herd of weasels on an all-kale diet?  More than twelve three-toed sloths on a treadmill?

 

 

*   *   *

Department Of If Only You’d Had A More Interesting Childhood

My mother once told me that she viewed cooking as the least favorite of (what she considered to be) her duties as a homemaker. Although her family never went hungry, that attitude was revealed in terms of the variety (read: not much) of dinners she served to her family. She was the target audience for the advertising mad men – the  marketers whose mission was to convince 1950s – 1970s homemakers that the roles and tasks to which women were relegated were tedious and burdensome.  Convenient, an adjective heretofore not associated with food, became lauded — packaged meals and prefab  “food products” would save her from the drudgery that was cooking (and, these salesmen assured her, these food products were ultimately “better” – as in, more nutritious – for her family than anything she might be able to cook).

And she bought it –  hook, line, and Hamburger Helper sinker.

A recent Fresh Air podcast featuring an interview with chef Chef Lidia Bastianich made me think of my childhood culinary “heritage,” such as it is.  [7]  Chef Lidia is yet another foreign born cook of humble beginnings who came to the USA and made her fame and fortune (in both the TV cooking shows, cookbooks and restaurant businesses) by presenting the cuisine and heritage of her youth to Americans.

When Fresh Air host Terry Gross asked Lidia about the ironies of serving peasant food in top-tier Manhattan restaurants, I wondered if I had missed my chance do the same. However, unlike Chef Lidia, moiself did not have an exotic Italian-Croatian background. What would be the peasant food of my SoCal childhood that I could make seem trendy – Tang? Cool Whip? Rice a Roni? Spaghetti-os?

 

 

 

With the right marketing Manhattan gourmands will pay $95 for this.

 

 

 

*   *   *

May you realize the futility of screaming at screens;
May anything rubber chicken-related make you think of…someone you love;  [8]
May you maintain an embarrassed fondness for the peasant food of your youth;
…and may the hijinks ensue.

 

Thanks for stopping by.  Au Vendredi!

 

*   *   *

 

 

[1] Raped at age 8, by a trusted adult.

[2] to wit, see Junot Díaz And The Myth Of Male Genius – How a male writer’s “brilliance” is used to explain away his obvious misogyny…

[3] Even better when they acquire said anything and present it to moiself.

[4] No surprise and to be expected, with any show that tacked political and social topical issues.

[5] The first time, I couldn’t quite believe I was hearing what I was hearing. And it was not an ad for hearing aids.

[6] To protect their privacy, I’ll call them Holly Robinson Peete and Rodney Peete.

[7] It isn’t, really.

[8] Betcha you thought, if only for a second, that moiself was going to write, “moiself.”