Department Of This Is So Wrong
Dateline: last week; a cloudy day; before 7 am. As with many of my morning walks I am headed in the direction of a light rail stop. As I circle the automobile roundabout I realize that moiself usually follows the sidewalk and/or another path skirting Veterans Gateway, a relatively recently constructed memorial garden “to commemorate veterans of all wars who honorably served our country.” [1]
Moiself turns around and decides to go through the Veterans Gateway. I see a small circular garden surrounding a brick patio, with a path which leads to seven larger paving stones set within the brick walkway. Each stone is engraved with the name of an “American” war, and the dates of the war’s beginning and end:
* American Revolution
April 19, 1775 To September 3, 1783
* Civil War
April 12, 1861 To May 9, 1865
* World War I
April 6, 1917 To November 11, 1918
Excusez moi, but what’s with wars commencing in April? The only thing I can think of is that our olden day wars took place before everyone had central heating; perhaps it was just too damn cold to think about bashing your enemies’ and/or neighbors’ heads until the spring thaw began….
Once again, I digress. There are four more war-stones ahead of me.
* World War II
December 7, 1941 to September 2, 1945
* Korean War
June 27, 1950 to July 27, 1953
* Vietnam War
August 5, 1964 to May 15, 1975
And then there is the last, WTF?!?!? stone, which wrenches my heart as I note the incomplete inscription:
* * *
Department Of Can We At Least Talk About It?
In the past few weeks I’ve seen several shares of this optimistic, motivational-type poster on Facebook. Confession: I both embraced (“Yes! We’ll change the discourse…!”) and snickered at it (“Like that will happen – wingnuts deny evidence or ignore it when it doesn’t fit into their narrative….” ) when I first saw it.
Learning new facts; reconsidering our positions; changing our minds. How often do I and other Well-Meaning People ® think that this applies to others, and not to ourselves?
Mere days after first seeing the Important Phrases poster, I listened to a Fresh Air podcast of Terry Gross interviewing Nikole Hannah-Jones. Journalist Hannah-Jones won a Pulitzer Prize for creating the 1619 project. The topic of the interview was, A Call For Reparations: How America Might Narrow The Racial Wealth Gap.
And I changed my mind.
I was unreservedly in favor of reparations for Japanese Americans interred during WWII [2] because the compensation occurred within the same generation of those who were racially profiled and unlawfully incarcerated: the government had records of exactly who was in the camp, whose farmlands were confiscated, etc.
But I was not exactly in favor of slavery reparations (which henceforth I shall refer to as simply, reparations). My mind was not made up and my opposition was not strongly held; I was never a hard no; rather, in many aspects I was a mealy-mouthed (mealy-minded?) “Gee…I wish.” My opinions were more like, sure-this-is-the-right-thing-to-do-but-it-will-*never*-work reservations, due to what I saw as the complex logistical administration of such reparations, the subsets of which include:
* What is the ultimate “aim” – what will reparations achieve?
* Who pays for it? And who doesn’t pay for it? If the funds/assets come from “The Federal Government,” that translates as taxpayer dollars. This being a nation of immigrants, a good portion of our citizenry’s antecedents arrived well after the days of slavery, Jim Crow, and even after the Civil Rights Act of 1960. My sister-in-law immigrated from China in 2003. Should any part of “her” money be used to atone for the actions of ancestors who were not hers?
* What exactly is the “payout” – what form will reparations take? Cash? Land? Business and educational grants? Some combination of all three?
* Who will receive reparations, and how? How will reparations recipients be determined? Not all Black Americans are descended from enslaved persons. What about recent immigrants from Africa? Do people with a “mixed” ethnic background qualify? What if your father’s father is a descendant of slavery and his mother was a Nigerian immigrant, and your mother is Irish-Italian – do you get 50% or 25% reparations? How can this be determined other than genetic tests for all…and then what if some weaselly white guy claims he’s owed a 15% reparation share because of what his DNA test shows – does he “qualify,” and if not, will/can he sue the government for discrimination?
* Will the costs of administering the reparations (including genetic testing – I just don’t see how you could determine recipients without it, and imagine the costs of testing millions of people, and then retesting when the results are disputed) come from the same funds as the reparations themselves…and then what other government programs will be cut as a result? Social Services? Efforts to combat global warming? Funds for education…medical and scientific research….?
These concerns with the logistics are neither new nor original, and the rare times I mouthed them [3] I did so without much conviction, other than to be “realistic.” I was primarily against reparations because of… other people. You know, the Other People ® who would be resistant, to put it mildly, to the concept.
Slavery reparations may be the single most divisive idea in American politics. Advocates have spent decades calling on the U.S. government to assess how such a policy could be implemented and to enact a law that might offer financial restitution to the descendants of enslaved people. But minds are made up — according to a recent Associated Press poll, 74 percent of African Americans now favor reparation payments, while 85 percent of whites oppose them — and Congress seems unlikely to take up the matter. A 30-year-old bill that would study the issue, H.R. 40, has never reached a vote.
( Thai Jones, writing in The Outlook, my emphases, The Washington Post, 1-31-20)
Moiself had no idea the numbers re white opposition (as quoted in the above excerpt) were so high. I *did* have the idea that there is a strong subset of US citizens who’d be vehemently opposed to reparations. Translation: White racists will lose their shit over this.
I thought there was little chance in getting our country to honestly address our history of enslavement and genocide. On the off-chance that we did, meanwhile, as we’d be fighting about it, issues like climate change – which affects every single person on the planet, and not just USA citizens – will get short shrift…and it will be too late for us all.
I thought that if the Federal Government ever approved reparations, demagogues would use the issue to foment an ugly awakening of the sleeping giant of white racism. But, guess what? Chief Little Bunker-Bitch [4] and his dog-whistle administration ***have already done that.***
So…I thought some more. I did that thing I always hope everyone else will do, on issues about which I feel passionate: I did more research. And thanks in great part to the rational, nuanced, exhaustively researched and articulately itemized reasoning presented by Hannah-Jones and others, I am on board for reparations.
Perhaps my logistical concerns/fears will play out, and reparations will be too complex (or dangerous) a policy to enact – who knows? But first, can we at least, seriously,
***have the conversation?***
Go back to the line I highlighted from the WaPo article: Congress has been sitting on a bill, a bill that would study the issue of reparations, for 30 years. THIRTY YEARS. It’s not even a bill to enact or require reparations, but Just. To. Study. The. Issue. And the bill can’t even get a hearing. What does that tell you about the minds blocking it?
* * *
Department Of Let Me Tell You About The Minds Blocking It
“And yet it moves.”
( … a phrase attributed to the Italian mathematician, physicist and philosopher Galileo Galilei in 1633 after being forced to recant his claims that the Earth moves around the Sun, rather than the converse….despite {Galileo’s forced} recantation, the Church’s proclamations to the contrary, or any other conviction or doctrine of men, the Earth does, in fact, move [around the Sun, and not vice versa].”) [5]
“Oh, “c’mon, just one little peek….”
The lines between the political and religious mindsets, especially in this country, are intertwined and in many cases nonexistent. There are facts, such as the following ones I’ve listed which were iterated by Hannah-Jones, that white conservative American politicians just don’t want to see, because acknowledgement of these facts will upend their world view, which seems to be Yes, slavery was bad, but it was abolished; that was then and this is now and things are better and we are post-racial so get over it.
“Reparations…is about repair…. In the context specifically of Black Americans, reparations has to do with 250 years of chattel slavery, followed by another 100 years of legalized segregation or apartheid and racial terrorism….”
“Very few Americans have created all of their wealth on their own; it’s passed down through generations and then built upon. Black Americans never really had a chance to do that.”
Hannah-Jones traces the wealth gap to slavery, and the fact that enslaved people were not allowed to own property. She notes that the legalized segregation and racial terrorism that followed slavery exacerbated the problem and “prevented generation after generation of Black Americans from acquiring the type of wealth or foothold in the economy that allows you to live a life that is much more typical of white Americans…. 250 years of slavery where they are unable to accumulate any capital and then coming out of slavery, Black Americans face the dragnet of discrimination and segregation that further prevented them from building any type of wealth. Black people were denied access to colleges, were denied access to high schools, were denied access to higher paying jobs. And when Black people were able to get some land or to build a business, oftentimes they face those businesses being stolen or burned down or destroyed…
…Black people being denied access to the primary wealth-building tools, homeownership, federally financed loans, the G.I. Bill to be able to purchase housing that white Americans use to build their wealth. And so what we see today is the stark chasm that was built up over generations, and then only made worse by the fact that today Black Americans still face discrimination across the spectrum of American life.
We are often taught in this country that Black people are emancipated and then everyone is on an even footing. We don’t often question, what does that mean, to be emancipated after 250 years of bondage — to be emancipated with no job, no home, no money, no clothes, no bed, no pots, nothing. Enslaved people were unable to own anything or to accrue anything at all….
(excerpts from A Call For Reparations…podcast)
A telescope aimed at historical reconsideration is not a lens through which most white conservative American politicians (who overwhelmingly tend to be religious) are eager to look. A bill to study reparations is stuck in congressional limbo, with our elected leaders unwilling even to study the issue. This reminds me of the church officials who not only disagreed with what the astronomer Galileo said he could see through his telescope, they refused to even look through it themselves. Why? Because to do so could mean acknowledging that their worldview was incorrect – their theology was diametrically opposed to the facts Galileo’s telescope revealed.
Galileo had constructed his telescope to show how the earth revolved about the sun and not the sun around the earth….
When he demonstrated this, many highly intelligent people even refused to look through the telescope, so frightened were they of what they might see. Some people had such a strong dose of cognitive dissonance that they forced Galileo to his knees and made him withdraw his evidence and recant his discovery.
Biblical references Psalm 93:1, 96:10, and 1 Chronicles 16:30 include text stating that “the world is firmly established, it cannot be moved.” In the same manner, Psalm 104:5 says, “the Lord set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved.” Further, Ecclesiastes 1:5 states that “And the sun rises and sets and returns to its place.”
The sentence of the Inquisition was delivered…Galileo was found “vehemently suspect of heresy”, namely of having held the opinions that the Sun lies motionless at the centre of the universe, that the Earth is not at its centre and moves, and that one may hold and defend an opinion as probable after it has been declared contrary to Holy Scripture. He was required to “abjure, curse and detest” those opinions.
From the article, “(Galileo and Truth,” The Library of Social Science)
* * *
Department Of Getting To The Point
My former (and other people’s current) concerns with the logistics of reparations are beside the proverbial point: the first, *long* overdue debate/discussion to be held should be *why* reparations are (or are not) necessary. Then, if it is determined that reparations are the way to go, you work out the details (including looking at how other countries, e.g post WWII Germany, and post-apartheid South Africa , administered reparations). Although it can seem overwhelmingly complex, the decision to go forward with reparations would be like any other major decision:
* First, you decide to do it
* Then, you figure out how to do it.
If reparations are the right thing to do then the consequences of doing so are also the right consequences to deal with. I mean, holy sci-fi dream: we were challenged to go to the moon within ten years, back in 1961, when our best scientific minds had had no fucking idea how they would accomplish that…and we did it.
* * *
Addendum to first story in this blog. Moiself returned to the Veterans Gateway memorial on my walk yesterday morning. What I found there illustrates why I often despair for the course chosen by some of my fellow human beings.
“Yeah, thank you for your service.”
* * *
* * *
Pun For The Day
I dated a man who was cross-eyed, but I broke up with him because
he was seeing other people on the side.
“And people think *I* smell bad….”
* * *
May you open our hearts and minds to that which seems impractical;
May we always remember that when discussing the most virtuous of issues there is always room for a bad pun;
May we know this: “And yet, it moves;
…and may the hijinks ensue.
Thanks for stopping by. Au Vendredi!
* * *
[1] (as per the descriptive plaque placed there by the Washington County United Veterans Council).
[2] (the reparations were dispersed via the Civil Liberties Act of 1988)
[3] Rare because the subject just hasn’t come up much in general political conversation… but I have a feeling that is going to change.
[4] For those of us who love our country and thus cannot bear to use the given name of the man who shits all over it, we use alternative monikers, ala #45, tRump, The Mandarin Mussolini, The Cheetos Dictator, Private Bonespurs…and my current favorite, as per the recent I’m-not-hiding-in-it-just-inspecting-it incident during the DC protests: Little Chief Bunker Bitch.
Jul 11, 2020 @ 13:48:02
Yes! Thank you for walking us through your thought process!
Jul 11, 2020 @ 14:00:26
You’re most welcome…I find it helpful when others do the same (“Oh, so *that’s* why they hold those cockamamie ideas…”) ;- ) .
Jul 13, 2020 @ 13:46:28
Hi Robyn, I found your post about the Rehab house that was in your neighborhood in 2017. My neighborhood is going through a similar situation and feel betrayed by our HOA board. I was curious to know if you have any updates about your neighborhood and that issue. thank you in advanced!
Jul 13, 2020 @ 16:18:01
You’re welcome, Lacey. It has been *very* quiet in our neighborhood, re the rehab home next door. Because of the disastrous way the acquisition and moving-in of the rehab was handled, with the director of the program essentially setting up an adversarial situation from the get-go, I think they (the rehab program administrators) gave a stern talking-to to the house staff, about the fact that the neighborhood did not want them there and so everyone has to be on their best behavior. And that seems to have worked so far.
Many – most, in fact – of the neighborhood fears (e.g., increased traffic, crime) have not materialized. The rehab residents walk to wherever they are going (most, apparently, to catch a bus 1/4 mile away) in the morning and return in the evening, and they initiate no contact – even avoiding eye contact – with the neighborhood homeowners…which makes me sad, as I have nothing against them personally and in fact wish them well (even though I didn’t want a rehab house next door). I hope the house residents are not told, “These people don’t want you here and don’t like you!” I have been able to speak once or twice with a a few of the residents (they cycle through; in this particular program, each rehab resident stays for 6 weeks), just to give a friendly greeting, when I was able to make eye contact with them. as they walked past me on the sidewalk. 😉
The down side for us, living right next door, is that every last one of the rehab residents in the supposedly “drug-free” house is addicted to the strongest drug of all, which happens to be legal: nicotine. The first thing residents do in the morning is go outside on them house’s back porch and smoke (house/fire regulations prohibit residents from smoking indoors, or on the front porch or yard). Rehab residents are required to be out of the house during the day – either taking classes or work or a combo of both — and the first thing they do upon returning from their day requirements is light up their cigarettes, and the last thing they do before their curfew (which seems to be 10 am) is light up again. The house’s backyard covered porch abuts the fence between their house and our yard, and the smoke drifts to our yard…so much and so strong that I just give up what I’m doing, if I’m outside, and go back inside. If we leave our sliding glass door open, the smell of smoke wafts into our house. Of course, we realize we could have that problem with regular homeowners, if we lived next door to smokers (but probably not 6 of them at once would be puffing away). It is legal to smoke outside on your own property so we have no recourse in that matter, and I have not asked them to move to the other side of the yard because I am unwilling to transfer the problem to the neighbor on the other side of the rehab house – a sweet elderly woman who cares for her grandchildren (who are almost always outside in her backyard).
So, after the initial hullabaloo, things for the most part are…what they are. The betrayal neighborhood homeowners felt from our city officials came in part from us not knowing what laws they were bound by, including how businesses that seems to be businesses may not in fact be treated as businesses (in other words, if your zoning seems to be residential only…well, surprise!)
When it comes time to sell our house, the concern re property values…we have no way of seeing into the future. We did find out via the initial fuss that addicts are a protected class of citizens; thus, when we sell our house we will not be required to disclose the existence of the rehab home next door….perhaps similar to the fact that we would not be required to tell prospective buyers, “Yeah, this is a great house. but the retired firefighter next door is the classic “GET OFF MY LAWN” grouch who yells at all the kids in the neighborhood…”
Best of luck to you!